Han Joon Koo, Choi Byung Ihn, Kim Ah Young, An Su Kyung, Lee Joon Woo, Kim Tae Kyung, Kim Sun-Whe
Departments of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28 Yongon-dong, Chongno-Gu, Seoul 110-744, Korea.
Radiographics. 2002 Jan-Feb;22(1):173-87. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.22.1.g02ja15173.
Cholangiocarcinomas that involve areas from the peripheral intrahepatic duct to the distal common duct have similar morphologic features, and traditional classification schemes based on the location of the involved ducts sometimes overlap. Nevertheless, cholangiocarcinoma is usually classified as either intrahepatic or extrahepatic, and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is further classified as either peripheral or hilar. However, the distinction between peripheral intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hilar cholangiocarcinoma is largely based on the site of origin. Therefore, in some tumors that arise peripheral to the secondary bifurcation of one of the hepatic ducts, clear differentiation between the two types of cholangiocarcinoma is not always possible. In addition, the distinction between hilar cholangiocarcinoma and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is not clearly defined. The different biologic behaviors of the tumors seem to be caused by their varying locations and their size at the time of diagnosis. Further molecular or biochemical investigation is needed to support the "field theory," which states that all cholangiocarcinomas are biologically the same tumor originating from the same biliary epithelium.
累及从肝内周围胆管至胆总管远端区域的胆管癌具有相似的形态学特征,基于受累胆管位置的传统分类方案有时会出现重叠。尽管如此,胆管癌通常分为肝内型或肝外型,肝内胆管癌进一步分为周围型或肝门型。然而,周围型肝内胆管癌和肝门部胆管癌之间的区别很大程度上基于起源部位。因此,在一些起源于肝管二级分支外周的肿瘤中,两种类型的胆管癌并不总是能够明确区分。此外,肝门部胆管癌和肝外胆管癌之间的区别也没有明确界定。肿瘤不同的生物学行为似乎是由其不同的位置以及诊断时的大小所导致的。需要进一步的分子或生化研究来支持“场理论”,该理论认为所有胆管癌在生物学上都是起源于同一胆管上皮的相同肿瘤。