Tsang Yuet, Siu Fung Ming, Ma Ngai Ling, Tsang Chun Wai
Department of Applied Biology and Chemical Technology and Central Laboratory of the Institute of Molecular Technology for Drug Discovery and Synthesis, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong.
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2002;16(3):229-37. doi: 10.1002/rcm.570.
Using a refined Gaussian-3 (G3) protocol, the highest level of ab initio calculations reported so far, we have established the Li+ cation binding enthalpy (affinity) at 0 K (in kJ mol-1) for formamide (195.7), N-methylformamide (209.2), N,N'-dimethylformamide (220.0), acetamide (211.7), N-methylacetamide (222.5), and N,N'-dimethylacetamide (230.1), with an estimated maximum uncertainty of +/-8 kJ mol-1. With these six theoretical lithium cation binding affinities as reference values, the absolute Li+ affinities of imidazole and dimethoxyethane were determined by the extended kinetic method, and by adopting the statistical data treatment protocol recently proposed by Armentrout. The Li+ affinities obtained for these two ligands are in good agreement (within 6 kJ mol-1) with recent values determined by the threshold collision-induced dissociation method, and consistent with the Li+ basicity values first reported by Taft and co-workers in 1990. Our study confirms that the previously suggested, and recently implemented, downward revision of Taft's original basicity scale by 10.9 kJ mol-1 is justified for ligands with revised basicities less than 151 kJ mol-1. However, for selected ligands with Li+ basicities greater than 151 kJ mol-1, including some of the six amides studied in this work, the reported discrepancy between theoretical and experimental estimates in the revised Li+ basicity scale of Burk et al. is likely to arise from experimental uncertainties.
我们采用一种精细的高斯-3(G3)协议(这是目前报道的最高水平的从头算计算方法),确定了甲酰胺(195.7)、N-甲基甲酰胺(209.2)、N,N'-二甲基甲酰胺(220.0)、乙酰胺(211.7)、N-甲基乙酰胺(222.5)和N,N'-二甲基乙酰胺(230.1)在0 K时的Li⁺阳离子结合焓(亲和力),估计最大不确定度为±8 kJ/mol。以这六个理论锂阳离子结合亲和力作为参考值,通过扩展动力学方法并采用Armentrout最近提出的统计数据处理方案,确定了咪唑和二甲氧基乙烷的绝对Li⁺亲和力。这两种配体获得的Li⁺亲和力与最近通过阈值碰撞诱导解离方法测定的值吻合良好(在6 kJ/mol以内),并且与Taft及其同事在1990年首次报道的Li⁺碱度值一致。我们的研究证实,对于碱度小于151 kJ/mol的配体,先前建议并最近实施的将Taft原始碱度标度向下修正10.9 kJ/mol是合理的。然而,对于选定的Li⁺碱度大于151 kJ/mol的配体,包括本工作中研究的六种酰胺中的一些,Burk等人修订的Li⁺碱度标度中理论估计值与实验估计值之间报道的差异可能源于实验不确定性。