Milsom J W, Hammerhofer K A, Böhm B, Marcello P, Elson P, Fazio V W
Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2001 Jan;44(1):1-8; discussion 8-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02234810.
Surgeons have been reluctant to apply laparoscopic techniques to Crohn's disease surgery because of concerns with evaluating and excising inflamed tissue using laparoscopic methods. Additionally in Crohn's disease surgery, laparoscopic techniques have not been demonstrated to have clear advantages over conventional ones.
We conducted a prospective, randomized trial in one surgical department comparing laparoscopic vs. conventional techniques in 60 patients (25 males), median age 34.4 (range, 10-60.1) years, undergoing elective ileocolic resection for refractory Crohn's disease. Postoperatively, all patients underwent measurement of pulmonary function tests every 12 hours, and were treated identically on a highly controlled protocol with regard to analgesic administration, feeding, and postoperative care.
Of the 31 patients assigned to laparoscopic and 29 to the conventional group, all had isolated Crohn's disease of the terminal ileum plus or minus the cecum. Median length of the incision was 5 cm in the laparoscopic group and 12 cm in the conventional group. Overall recovery of 80 percent of forced expiratory volume (one second) and forced vital capacity was a median of 2.5 days for laparoscopic and 3.5 days for conventional (P = 0.03). There was no difference in the amount of morphine equivalents used between groups postoperatively. Flatus and first bowel movement returned a median of 3 and 4 days, respectively, after laparoscopic vs. 3.3 and 4 days, respectively, after conventional surgery (P = 0.21). Median length of stay was five (range, 4-30) days for laparoscopic, and six (range, 4-18) days for conventional surgery. Major complications occurred in one patient in each group. Minor complications occurred in four laparoscopic and eight conventional patients (P < 0.05). There were no deaths. Two laparoscopic patients were converted to conventional as a result of adhesions or inflammation. All patients recovered well and there were no clinical recurrences in the follow-up period (median, 20; range, 12-45 months).
Within a single institution, single surgical team, prospective, randomized trial, laparoscopic techniques offered a faster recovery of pulmonary function, fewer complications, and shorter length of stay compared with conventional surgery for selected patients undergoing ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease.
由于担心使用腹腔镜方法评估和切除炎症组织,外科医生一直不愿将腹腔镜技术应用于克罗恩病手术。此外,在克罗恩病手术中,腹腔镜技术尚未被证明比传统技术具有明显优势。
我们在一个外科科室进行了一项前瞻性随机试验,比较60例(25例男性)患者(年龄中位数34.4岁,范围10 - 60.1岁)行择期回结肠切除术治疗难治性克罗恩病时腹腔镜技术与传统技术的效果。术后,所有患者每12小时进行一次肺功能测试,并在镇痛给药、进食和术后护理方面按照高度控制的方案进行相同治疗。
在分配到腹腔镜组的31例患者和传统组的29例患者中,所有患者均为孤立性末端回肠克罗恩病,累及或不累及盲肠。腹腔镜组切口的中位数长度为5厘米,传统组为12厘米。用力呼气量(一秒)和用力肺活量总体恢复80%的时间,腹腔镜组中位数为2.5天,传统组为3.5天(P = 0.03)。两组术后使用的吗啡等效剂量无差异。腹腔镜手术后,排气和首次排便恢复的中位数分别为术后3天和4天,传统手术后分别为3.3天和4天(P = 0.21)。腹腔镜手术住院时间中位数为5天(范围4 - 30天),传统手术为6天(范围4 - 18天)。每组各有1例患者发生主要并发症。腹腔镜组有4例患者、传统组有8例患者发生轻微并发症(P < 0.05)。无死亡病例。2例腹腔镜手术患者因粘连或炎症转为传统手术。所有患者恢复良好,随访期间(中位数20个月,范围12 - 45个月)无临床复发。
在单一机构、单一手术团队进行的前瞻性随机试验中,对于因克罗恩病行回结肠切除术的特定患者,与传统手术相比,腹腔镜技术可使肺功能恢复更快、并发症更少且住院时间更短。