• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Open haemorrhoidectomy revisited.

作者信息

Uba A F, Ihezue C H, Obekpa P O, Iya D, Legbo J N

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Jos University Teaching Hospital, Jos, Nigeria.

出版信息

Niger J Med. 2001 Oct-Dec;10(4):185-8.

PMID:11806002
Abstract

The open method of haemorrhoidectomy has been criticized because of slow wound healing, severe pain and prolonged post operative care. This has led to a shift of interest to other methods of haemorrhoidectomy. These grounds of criticism need to be re-appraised for a rational conclusion and recommendation. Thirty nine consecutive patients who had open haemorrhoidectomy between 2nd and 3rd degree haemorrhoids from May, 1998 to April, 1999 were prospectively assessed for wound healing rate and complication rate. There were 26 males and 13 females (ratio 2:1). The average length of hospital stay was 3 days. Post operative pain and acute retention of urine were the commonest complications. The mean wound healing rate was 5 weeks, with a peak (30.8%) in the 5th post operative week. The mean cost of management was thirty eight U.S. Dollars ($38.00) or four thousand, five hundred and ninety three Naira. (N4,593.00). Open haemorrhoidectomy remains a safe and simple surgical technique that should not be discarded in complete preference to newer innovative methods.

摘要

相似文献

1
Open haemorrhoidectomy revisited.
Niger J Med. 2001 Oct-Dec;10(4):185-8.
2
Open versus closed haemorrhoidectomy.开放性痔切除术与闭合性痔切除术
Niger Postgrad Med J. 2004 Jun;11(2):79-83.
3
Randomized controlled trial of open and closed haemorrhoidectomy.
Br J Surg. 1997 Dec;84(12):1729-30.
4
A comparison between open and closed hemorrhoidectomy.开放式与闭合式痔切除术的比较。
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2011 Jan-Mar;23(1):114-6.
5
Outcome of stapled haemorrhoidectomy versus Milligan Morgan's haemorrhoidectomy.吻合器痔切除术与Milligan Morgan痔切除术的疗效比较
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2009 Sep;19(9):561-5.
6
Randomised trial comparing LigaSure haemorrhoidectomy with the diathermy dissection operation.比较LigaSure痔切除术与电刀切除术的随机试验。
Tech Coloproctol. 2002 Dec;6(3):171-5. doi: 10.1007/s101510200038.
7
Outcome of the rubber band ligation with Milligan Morgan haemorrhoidectomy.橡皮圈套扎术联合Milligan Morgan痔切除术的疗效
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2010 Oct-Dec;22(4):56-60.
8
Randomized clinical trial of LigaSure and conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy.LigaSure与传统电凝痔切除术的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2007 Aug;94(8):937-42. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5904.
9
Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy.比较吻合器痔切除术与开放式痔切除术的前瞻性随机多中心试验。
Br J Surg. 2001 May;88(5):669-74. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01772.x.
10
Haemorrhoidectomy: Ferguson's (closed) vs Milligan Morgan's technique (open).痔切除术:弗格森(闭合式)与米利根·摩根技术(开放式)对比
Nepal Med Coll J. 2009 Jun;11(2):136-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Experience with rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids in northern Nigeria.尼日利亚北部使用橡皮圈套扎法治疗痔疮的经验。
Niger Med J. 2013 Jul;54(4):258-60. doi: 10.4103/0300-1652.119654.
2
Surgical management of hemorrhoids.痔疮的外科治疗
J Surg Tech Case Rep. 2011 Jul;3(2):68-75. doi: 10.4103/2006-8808.92797.