Suppr超能文献

V类复合树脂修复体中亲水性粘结系统的微渗漏

Microleakage of hydrophilic adhesive systems in Class V composite restorations.

作者信息

Amaral C M, Hara A T, Pimenta L A, Rodrigues A L

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Piracicaba, University of Campinas, Brazil.

出版信息

Am J Dent. 2001 Feb;14(1):31-3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the microleakage of four hydrophilic adhesive systems: one "multiple-bottles" (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus); two "one-bottle" (Single Bond, Stae); and one self-etching (Etch & Prime 3.0).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

120 bovine incisor teeth were divided into four groups (n = 30) and Class V cavities were prepared at the cemento-enamel junction. The cavities were restored with the adhesive systems and with Z100 composite. The teeth were thermocycled 1,000 times between 5+/-2 degrees C and 55+/-2 degrees C with a dwell time of 1 min, and then placed in a 2% methylene blue dye (pH 7.0) for 4 hrs, washed and sectioned vertically through the center of the restorations. The qualitative evaluation was made by three examiners who distributed pre-established scores (0-4) for each tooth using a stereomicroscope at x30 magnification.

RESULTS

In enamel margins little microleakage was observed and the Kruskal-Wallis analysis did not show differences. In dentin margins the Kruskal-Wallis and multiple comparison analyses were applied: microleakage was significantly greater with Stae (median 3) and Scotchbond MP Plus (median 4). Single Bond (median 1) and Etch & Prime 3.0 (median 2) showed the best results in dentin margins, and the statistical analysis did not demonstrate differences in microleakage among these groups.

摘要

目的

研究四种亲水性粘结系统的微渗漏情况:一种“多瓶型”(Scotchbond多功能加强型);两种“单瓶型”(Single Bond、Stae);以及一种自酸蚀型(Etch & Prime 3.0)。

材料与方法

120颗牛切牙分为四组(每组n = 30),在牙骨质-釉质界制备V类洞。用粘结系统和Z100复合树脂修复窝洞。牙齿在5±2℃和55±2℃之间进行1000次热循环,每次保持时间为1分钟,然后置于2%亚甲蓝染料(pH 7.0)中4小时,冲洗后沿修复体中心垂直切片。由三名检查者进行定性评估,他们使用放大30倍的体视显微镜为每颗牙齿分配预先设定的分数(0 - 4)。

结果

在釉质边缘观察到的微渗漏很少,Kruskal - Wallis分析未显示出差异。在牙本质边缘应用了Kruskal - Wallis和多重比较分析:Stae(中位数为3)和Scotchbond MP Plus(中位数为4)的微渗漏明显更大。Single Bond(中位数为1)和Etch & Prime 3.0(中位数为2)在牙本质边缘显示出最佳结果,并且统计分析未显示这些组之间微渗漏的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验