Makeig S, Westerfield M, Jung T P, Enghoff S, Townsend J, Courchesne E, Sejnowski T J
Computational Neurobiology Laboratory and, The Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Salk Institute, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, San Diego, CA 92037, USA.
Science. 2002 Jan 25;295(5555):690-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1066168.
It has been long debated whether averaged electrical responses recorded from the scalp result from stimulus-evoked brain events or stimulus-induced changes in ongoing brain dynamics. In a human visual selective attention task, we show that nontarget event-related potentials were mainly generated by partial stimulus-induced phase resetting of multiple electroencephalographic processes. Independent component analysis applied to the single-trial data identified at least eight classes of contributing components, including those producing central and lateral posterior alpha, left and right mu, and frontal midline theta rhythms. Scalp topographies of these components were consistent with their generation in compact cortical domains.
长期以来,人们一直在争论从头皮记录的平均电反应是由刺激诱发的脑事件引起的,还是由刺激引起的正在进行的脑动力学变化导致的。在一项人类视觉选择性注意任务中,我们表明非目标事件相关电位主要由多个脑电图过程的部分刺激诱发相位重置产生。应用于单次试验数据的独立成分分析识别出至少八类有贡献的成分,包括那些产生中央和外侧后部阿尔法、左右缪以及额中线西塔节律的成分。这些成分的头皮地形图与它们在紧密皮质区域的产生一致。