Combipolar sensing in dual chamber pacing: is there still a need for bipolar leads in the atrium?

Bipolar leads have been shown to provide superior sensing conditions compared to unipolar leads as bipolar sensing is less susceptible to interference. However, the mechanical long-term integrity and longevity of bipolar leads is inferior to that of unipolar leads. A prospective randomized, multicenter study was performed to investigate a new atrial detection configuration called combipolar sensing. This new sensing concept is designed for the use of conventional unipolar leads in the atrium and the ventricle. While the atrial stimulation is unipolar, atrial sensing is accomplished in a bipolar way using the ventricular lead tip as the indifferent electrode. A modified dual chamber pacemaker provided with this sensing concept was implanted in 26 patients. At predischarge and at the 1- and 3-month follow-ups no significant differences in atrial sensing thresholds and P wave amplitudes were found between the unipolar and the combipolar sensing configuration at rest or during provocation. Myopotential inhibition could be demonstrated in 22 patients during unipolar sensing at sensitivity settings as "low" as 2 mV. In contrast, during combipolar sensing it could only be demonstrated in one patient once and only at the highest atrial sensitivity of 0.5 mV. Combipolar atrial sensing is feasible under normal conditions and during provocation. Myopotential interference is negligible. Thus, combipolar sensing offers comparable atrial sensing to bipolar without the disadvantages of a bipolar lead.