Suppr超能文献

证明天然产物作为抗感染药物的有效性。

Demonstrating the validity of natural products as anti-infective drugs.

作者信息

Schuster B G

机构信息

Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Washington, DC 20307-5100, USA.

出版信息

J Altern Complement Med. 2001;7 Suppl 1:S73-82. doi: 10.1089/107555301753393832.

Abstract

This presentation reviews the synthetic or classical development pathway of drug development and contrasts it with developing natural products as drugs. Also presented is an example of a traditional medicine that has been developed from a natural product and has become a "new/old" antiparasitic drug used in the treatment of malaria. The classic paradigm of synthetic drug development breaks down into drug discovery, drug design, preclinical studies, and clinical studies. This paradigm, constructed to weed out failures, results in a drug-development process that is high risk, time consuming, and expensive. The process requires screening an average of 10,000 active compounds to find a single compound that successfully makes its way through validation to drug approval and the marketplace. Following this paradigm, researchers progress from identifying a chemical lead to testing the compound in humans. The World Health Organization (WHO) Guidelines for the Assessment of Herbal Medicines are based on the classical guidelines and follow the classical approach to validating quality, safety, and efficacy--with one major difference. The starting point is to look at the natural product in humans. By taking into account the traditional experience with the product, the validation standard for safety and efficacy of natural products allows for the prolonged and apparently uneventful use of a substance to offer testimony of its safety. The reliance, then, is on experience--or what Western regulatory agencies would call "anecdotal information." Since most phytomedicines are a combination of several active ingredients, the WHO guidelines cover two kinds of combination products: Combinations that are already used in traditional medicine are considered "old" combination products. "New" combination products are well-known substances that are now being used in combination. Artemisia annua, a pervasive weed, has been referred to in Chinese medicine for thousands of years as a treatment for fever. In 1971, an extraction of artemisia yielded activity against Plasmodium berghei, a mouse model for malaria. The isolated compound, artemisinin, is an example of a traditional medicine that started out in humans, but which then provided a lead structure for a standard drug-development paradigm. Today, artemisinin derivatives are being used widely in combination therapy, especially in areas of the world where there is multidrug-resistant malaria.

摘要

本报告回顾了药物研发的合成或经典发展途径,并将其与天然产物作为药物的研发进行了对比。还介绍了一种从天然产物开发而来、已成为用于治疗疟疾的“新/旧”抗寄生虫药物的传统药物实例。合成药物研发的经典模式可细分为药物发现、药物设计、临床前研究和临床研究。这种为剔除失败案例而构建的模式,导致药物研发过程风险高、耗时且昂贵。该过程平均需要筛选10000种活性化合物,才能找到一种成功通过验证并获得药物批准进入市场的化合物。按照这种模式,研究人员从确定化学先导物开始,逐步在人体中测试该化合物。世界卫生组织(WHO)的草药评估指南基于经典指南,并遵循验证质量、安全性和有效性的经典方法——但有一个主要区别。起点是观察天然产物在人体中的情况。通过考虑对该产品的传统经验,天然产物安全性和有效性的验证标准允许长期且明显无不良事件的使用某种物质来证明其安全性。因此,依靠的是经验——或者西方监管机构所称的“轶事信息”。由于大多数植物药是几种活性成分的组合,WHO指南涵盖两种组合产品:传统医学中已使用的组合被视为“旧”组合产品。“新”组合产品是现在正在组合使用的知名物质。青蒿,一种常见的杂草,在中医中作为治疗发热的药物已有数千年历史。1971年,青蒿提取物对伯氏疟原虫(一种疟疾小鼠模型)产生了活性。分离出的化合物青蒿素就是一个传统药物的例子,它始于人体应用,但随后为标准药物研发模式提供了先导结构。如今,青蒿素衍生物被广泛用于联合治疗,尤其是在世界上存在多药耐药性疟疾的地区。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验