Hewitt L S
Child Dev. 1975 Jun;46(2):540-4.
Dutch boys 8 and 12 years old read brief stories about a harm doer whose intentions were either good or bad and whose actions resulted in either minor or serious injury to a victim. The harm doer had previously been either strongly provoked or not provoked by the victim. The older boys differentiated their evaluations of the harm doer's naughtiness on the basis of provocation and intentions, while the younger boys failed to differentiate their evaluations of the provoked harm doer on the basis of intentions. Both age groups strongly differentiated their judgments of the victim's naughtiness on the basis of his role as provoker, except when the victim was seriously injured by a bad-intentioned aggressor.
8岁和12岁的荷兰男孩阅读了一些简短的故事，故事讲述了一个作恶者，其意图有好有坏，其行为对受害者造成了轻微或严重的伤害。作恶者此前要么受到了受害者的强烈挑衅，要么未受到挑衅。年龄较大的男孩根据挑衅和意图来区分他们对作恶者顽皮程度的评价，而年龄较小的男孩未能根据意图来区分他们对被挑衅的作恶者的评价。两个年龄组都根据受害者作为挑衅者的角色来强烈区分他们对受害者顽皮程度的判断，除非受害者被恶意攻击者严重伤害。
