• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童对社会情境中心理伤害的判断。

Children's judgements about psychological harm in social context.

作者信息

Helwig C C, Hildebrandt C, Turiel E

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Child Dev. 1995 Dec;66(6):1680-93.

PMID:8556892
Abstract

72 children, ages 6 to 11 years, were presented with a series of stories involving psychological harm (name-calling) in a game context. Situations were presented in which intentions, consequences, and game context were varied, along with order of story presentation. Comparison between acts of physical and psychological harm were also conducted. Although responses in some conditions were influenced by order of presentation, age differences were found in children's evaluations of agents' actions and recipients' reactions for psychological harm in game contexts. Younger children were more likely to ignore intentions and consequences or the recipient's perspective and to focus on contextual features (e.g. game rules). Older children were more likely to base their evaluations on intentions, or both intentions and consequences, and to take into account the recipient's perspective. Game context interacted differentially with psychological and physical harm at all ages. Evaluations of acts of physical harm were more likely than acts of psychological harm to be transformed by game context.

摘要

72名6至11岁的儿童被呈现了一系列在游戏情境中涉及心理伤害(辱骂)的故事。呈现的情境中,意图、后果和游戏情境各不相同,故事呈现顺序也有所变化。同时还对身体伤害行为和心理伤害行为进行了比较。尽管在某些条件下的反应受到呈现顺序的影响,但在游戏情境中,儿童对施害者行为和受害者反应的心理伤害评估存在年龄差异。年龄较小的儿童更有可能忽略意图、后果或受害者的视角,而专注于情境特征(如游戏规则)。年龄较大的儿童更有可能基于意图,或意图和后果两者来进行评估,并考虑受害者的视角。在所有年龄段,游戏情境与心理伤害和身体伤害的相互作用方式不同。与心理伤害行为相比,身体伤害行为的评估更有可能因游戏情境而改变。

相似文献

1
Children's judgements about psychological harm in social context.儿童对社会情境中心理伤害的判断。
Child Dev. 1995 Dec;66(6):1680-93.
2
The influence of negligence, intention, and outcome on children's moral judgments.疏忽、意图和结果对儿童道德判断的影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Dec;104(4):382-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.08.001. Epub 2009 Sep 8.
3
Children's use of motives and intentionality in person perception and moral judgement.儿童在人物认知和道德判断中对动机和意图的运用。
Child Dev. 1975 Dec;46(4):904-12.
4
The effects of provocation, intentions, and consequences on children's moral judgments.挑衅、意图和后果对儿童道德判断的影响。
Child Dev. 1975 Jun;46(2):540-4.
5
The effect of personal relevance on psychological inference: a developmental analysis.
Child Dev. 1988 Oct;59(5):1339-52.
6
Moral development in a violent society: Colombian children's judgments in the context of survival and revenge.暴力社会中的道德发展:哥伦比亚儿童在生存与复仇背景下的判断
Child Dev. 2008 Jul-Aug;79(4):882-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01165.x.
7
Children's judgements of psychological harm in normal and noncanonical situations.儿童对正常和非典型情境中心理伤害的判断。
Child Dev. 2001 Jan-Feb;72(1):66-81. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00266.
8
Just-world reasoning in children's immanent justice judgements.儿童内在公正判断中的公正世界推理
Child Dev. 1990 Aug;61(4):1024-33.
9
Moral complexity in middle childhood: children's evaluations of necessary harm.儿童中期的道德复杂性:儿童对必要伤害的评价。
Dev Psychol. 2014 Jan;50(1):22-33. doi: 10.1037/a0032992. Epub 2013 May 6.
10
The morality of harm.伤害的道德性。
Cognition. 2009 Oct;113(1):80-92. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.015. Epub 2009 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Children and Adolescents' Ingroup Biases and Developmental Differences in Evaluations of Peers Who Misinform.儿童和青少年在对提供错误信息的同伴的评价中的内群体偏见及发展差异。
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 15;13:835695. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.835695. eCollection 2022.
2
Children's group identity is related to their assessment of fair and unfair advantages.儿童群体认同与他们对公平和不公平优势的评估有关。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2022 Feb;214:105292. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105292. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
3
"There are no band-aids for emotions": The development of thinking about emotional harm.
“情绪没有创可贴”:情绪伤害观念的发展。
Dev Psychol. 2021 Jun;57(6):913-926. doi: 10.1037/dev0001187.
4
Moral Reasoning about Aggressive Behavior in Relation to Type of Aggression, Age and Gender in South Korean Pupils.韩国中小学生的攻击行为、年龄和性别与道德推理的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 25;18(5):2288. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052288.
5
Intention Attribution and the Development of Moral Evaluation.意图归因与道德评价的发展
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 7;9:2663. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02663. eCollection 2018.
6
Explaining the U-Shaped Development of Intent-Based Moral Judgments.解释基于意图的道德判断的U型发展。
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 18;7:219. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00219. eCollection 2016.
7
Adolescent judgments and reasoning about the failure to include peers with social disabilities.青少年对未纳入有社交障碍同伴的判断与推理。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2015 Jun;45(6):1873-86. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2348-7.
8
The mentalistic basis of core social cognition: experiments in preverbal infants and a computational model.核心社会认知的心理主义基础:前言语婴儿的实验与计算模型。
Dev Sci. 2013 Mar;16(2):209-226. doi: 10.1111/desc.12017.