Cook Richard J, Wei Wei
Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, N2L 3G1, Canada.
Stat Med. 2002 Feb 28;21(4):515-31. doi: 10.1002/sim.1014.
Selection criteria are specified in clinical trials to define the study population from which the sample will be obtained. It is common for one of these criteria to be based on historical or baseline measurements of the clinical sign or symptom that will serve as the response variable in the trial. The effect of such selection criteria has been studied extensively for normally distributed responses, but less is known about the situation in which the response is a count or a possibly recurrent event. In this paper we examine the bias and relative efficiency of some common methods of analysis for count data in the presence of selection criteria. The investigation is carried out using asymptotic theory pertaining to misspecified models and by simulation. Applications involving data from an epilepsy trial and a study of transient myocardial ischaemia illustrate the effect of ignoring the selection mechanism.
临床试验中规定了选择标准,以定义将从中获取样本的研究人群。这些标准之一通常基于将作为试验中反应变量的临床体征或症状的历史测量值或基线测量值。对于正态分布的反应,此类选择标准的影响已得到广泛研究,但对于反应为计数或可能反复发生的事件的情况,了解较少。在本文中,我们研究了存在选择标准时一些常见计数数据分析方法的偏差和相对效率。该研究使用与错误指定模型相关的渐近理论并通过模拟进行。涉及癫痫试验数据和短暂性心肌缺血研究的应用说明了忽略选择机制的影响。