• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

技术支持对临床医生对一项结果评估工具态度的影响。

The effect of technical support on clinician attitudes toward an outcome assessment instrument.

作者信息

Close-Goedjen Jennifer L, Saunders Stephen M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Marquette University, USA.

出版信息

J Behav Health Serv Res. 2002 Feb;29(1):99-108. doi: 10.1007/BF02287837.

DOI:10.1007/BF02287837
PMID:11840909
Abstract

This study evaluated the impact of technical support on mental health clinicians' attitudes and use of an outcome assessment (OA) instrument. Technical support involved providing clinicians with the scored and profiled results of an OA instrument administered to their patients. It was predicted that temporary exposure to the instrument's uses would improve clinicians' attitudes toward the instrument and that improved attitudes would lead to greater use. The results indicated that subsequent to support clinicians' attitudes toward the instrument were generally more positive, as they had generally more favorable opinions, saw it as more relevant, and reported that it was relatively easy to use. Contrary to expectations, however, clinicians did not use the OA instrument more frequently or regularly after support. The implications for clinics seeking to implement OA protocols are discussed.

摘要

本研究评估了技术支持对心理健康临床医生态度及使用结果评估(OA)工具的影响。技术支持包括向临床医生提供其患者所接受OA工具的评分及分析结果。研究预测,临时接触该工具的用途将改善临床医生对该工具的态度,而态度的改善将导致更多使用。结果表明,在获得支持后,临床医生对该工具的态度总体上更为积极,因为他们普遍持有更赞许的观点,认为其更具相关性,并报告称该工具相对易于使用。然而,与预期相反,临床医生在获得支持后并未更频繁或定期地使用OA工具。文中讨论了对寻求实施OA方案的诊所的启示。

相似文献

1
The effect of technical support on clinician attitudes toward an outcome assessment instrument.技术支持对临床医生对一项结果评估工具态度的影响。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2002 Feb;29(1):99-108. doi: 10.1007/BF02287837.
2
Pragmatics of tracking mental health outcomes in a managed care setting.
J Ment Health Adm. 1995 Summer;22(3):226-36. doi: 10.1007/BF02521118.
3
Attitudes toward standardized assessment tools and their use among clinicians in a public mental health service.公立精神卫生服务机构中临床医生对标准化评估工具及其使用的态度。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;73(7):387-396. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2019.1642383. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
4
The Revised Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-R): reliability and validity.修订版行为与症状识别量表(BASIS-R):信度与效度
Med Care. 2004 Dec;42(12):1230-41. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200412000-00010.
5
An instrument to assess competencies of providers treating severe mental illness.一种评估治疗严重精神疾病的医疗服务提供者能力的工具。
Ment Health Serv Res. 2003 Jun;5(2):97-108. doi: 10.1023/a:1023281527952.
6
How to involve staff in developing an outcomes-oriented organization.如何让员工参与创建一个以成果为导向的组织。
Behav Healthc Tomorrow. 1998 Jun;7(3):29-31, 62.
7
Improving clinicians' attitudes toward providing feedback on routine outcome assessments.改善临床医生对就常规结果评估提供反馈的态度。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2009 Jun;18(3):211-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2009.00596.x.
8
Private practitioners' documentation of outpatient psychiatric treatment: questioning managed care.
J Behav Health Serv Res. 1999 May;26(2):151-70. doi: 10.1007/BF02287488.
9
Clinicians' Attitudes Towards Outcome and Process Monitoring: A Validation of the Outcome Measurement Questionnaire.临床医生对结果监测和过程监测的态度:结果测量问卷的验证
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015 Sep;42(5):634-41. doi: 10.1007/s10488-014-0597-6.
10
Outcomes: be careful what you measure. Cutting corners in resource-poor times is not the answer.结果:小心你所衡量的东西。在资源匮乏时期偷工减料不是解决办法。
Behav Healthc Tomorrow. 2000 Oct;9(5):20-2, 33, 40-2.

引用本文的文献

1
The results of clinician-focused implementation strategies on uptake and outcomes of Measurement-Based Care (MBC) in general mental health care.以临床医生为重点的实施策略对一般心理健康护理中测量为基础的护理(MBC)的采用和结果的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 1;23(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09343-5.
2
Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure of the Current Assessment Practice Evaluation-Revised (CAPER) in a National Sample.全国样本中当前评估实践评估修订版(CAPER)的信度、效度和因子结构
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2019 Jan;46(1):43-63. doi: 10.1007/s11414-018-9621-z.
3
A Digital Feedback System to Support Implementation of Measurement-Based Care by School-Based Mental Health Clinicians.

本文引用的文献

1
Bringing staff on board: creating an outcomes project tied to continuous quality improvement in an adult community residential service.让员工参与进来:在成人社区居住服务中创建一个与持续质量改进相关的成果项目。
Eval Program Plann. 1999 May;22(2):221-32. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7189(99)00002-6.
2
The era of accountability in behavioral health care.
Manag Care Interface. 1999 Jul;12(7):44-50.
3
Pragmatics of tracking mental health outcomes in a managed care setting.
J Ment Health Adm. 1995 Summer;22(3):226-36. doi: 10.1007/BF02521118.
4
数字反馈系统支持校医实施基于测量的精神保健。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2019;48(sup1):S168-S179. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2017.1280808. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
4
Clinician use of standardized assessments following a common elements psychotherapy training and consultation program.临床医生在接受通用要素心理治疗培训和咨询项目后对标准化评估的使用。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015 Jan;42(1):47-60. doi: 10.1007/s10488-014-0543-7.
5
The use of routine outcome measures in two child and adolescent mental health services: a completed audit cycle.在两家儿童和青少年心理健康服务机构中使用常规结果测量:一个完整的审计周期。
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Oct 20;13:270. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-270.
6
Implementation of routine outcome measurement in child and adolescent mental health services in the United Kingdom: a critical perspective.英国儿童和青少年心理健康服务中常规结果测量的实施:批判性视角。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014 Apr;23(4):239-42. doi: 10.1007/s00787-013-0454-2. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
7
Field test of the feasibility and validity of using the Hoosier Assurance Plan Instrument for Adults in a state mental health program.
Community Ment Health J. 2009 Aug;45(4):316-22. doi: 10.1007/s10597-009-9214-7. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
Attitudes to the use of health outcome questionnaires in the routine care of patients with diabetes: a survey of general practitioners and practice nurses.糖尿病患者常规护理中对使用健康结果问卷的态度:全科医生和执业护士调查
Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Sep;48(434):1555-9.
5
Attitudes of mental health personnel towards rating outcome.心理健康工作人员对评定结果的态度。
J Qual Clin Pract. 1998 Jun;18(2):109-15.
6
Whose outcomes. Patients, providers, or payers?谁的结果?患者、医疗服务提供者还是支付方?
Nurs Clin North Am. 1997 Sep;32(3):513-20.
7
Quality of care and cost-containment in managed mental health: policy, education, research, advocacy.
Psychol Rep. 1996 Dec;79(3 Pt 2):1395-422. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1996.79.3f.1395.
8
Physicians speak out on outcomes measurement.医生们就结果测量问题发表意见。
Mich Med. 1996 Feb;95(2):32-3.
9
Outcomes research and practice guidelines. Upstream issues for downstream users.结果研究与实践指南。下游用户的上游问题。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1996 Mar-Apr;26(2):38-44.
10
A phase model of psychotherapy outcome: causal mediation of change.心理治疗结果的阶段模型:改变的因果中介作用。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993 Aug;61(4):678-85. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.61.4.678.