• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谁的结果?患者、医疗服务提供者还是支付方?

Whose outcomes. Patients, providers, or payers?

作者信息

Kleinpell R M

机构信息

Rush University College of Nursing, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Clin North Am. 1997 Sep;32(3):513-20.

PMID:9254636
Abstract

While it is clear that measuring outcomes is important, choosing which outcomes to measure remains unclear. Controversy exists in outcomes measurement as to which specific outcome measures should be selected. Additionally, should one set of outcome measures be used for one purpose, such as comparing overall medical outcomes and another set used for another purpose, such as comparing individual patient outcomes? While it becomes obvious that comparisons would be easier if the same outcomes were used, knowing which outcomes to choose to best measure an effect is not always an easy task. The challenge in outcomes measurement comes in selecting outcomes that are comprehensive, comparable, meaningful, and accurate in their reflection of the effects of care.

摘要

虽然很明显衡量结果很重要,但选择衡量哪些结果仍不明确。在结果测量方面存在争议,即应选择哪些具体的结果测量指标。此外,一组结果测量指标是否应用于一个目的,比如比较总体医疗结果,而另一组用于另一个目的,比如比较个体患者结果?虽然如果使用相同的结果进行比较会更明显,但知道选择哪些结果来最好地衡量效果并非总是易事。结果测量的挑战在于选择那些全面、可比、有意义且能准确反映护理效果的结果。

相似文献

1
Whose outcomes. Patients, providers, or payers?谁的结果?患者、医疗服务提供者还是支付方?
Nurs Clin North Am. 1997 Sep;32(3):513-20.
2
Challenges in measuring patient outcomes.测量患者预后的挑战。
Nurs Clin North Am. 1997 Sep;32(3):495-512.
3
Measuring the contribution of nursing to quality, patient safety, and health care outcomes.衡量护理对质量、患者安全及医疗保健结果的贡献。
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2007 Feb;8(1):20-36. doi: 10.1177/1527154407302115.
4
Using clinical outcomes to explore the theory of expert practice in physical therapy.利用临床结果探索物理治疗中专家实践的理论。
Phys Ther. 2003 Dec;83(12):1090-106.
5
Health-related quality of life, satisfaction, and economic outcome measures in studies of prostate cancer screening and treatment, 1990-2000.1990 - 2000年前列腺癌筛查与治疗研究中的健康相关生活质量、满意度及经济结果指标
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2004(33):78-101. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgh016.
6
Meaningful information or a bureaucratic exercise? Exploring the value of routine outcome measurement in mental health.有意义的信息还是官僚主义的做法?探索心理健康常规结果测量的价值。
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2008 Oct;29(10):1098-114. doi: 10.1080/01612840802319852.
7
Examining the relationship between patient-centred care and outcomes on a neuroscience unit: a pilot project.探究神经科学科室以患者为中心的护理与治疗结果之间的关系:一项试点项目。
Can J Neurosci Nurs. 2008;30(2):14-9.
8
Measures in chiropractic research: choosing patient-based outcome assessments.整脊疗法研究中的测量方法:选择基于患者的结局评估指标。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Jun;31(5):355-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.04.007.
9
Measuring patient-oriented outcomes in palliative care: functionality and quality of life.评估姑息治疗中以患者为导向的结果:功能与生活质量。
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2008 Feb;12(1):65-77. doi: 10.1188/08.CJON.65-77.
10
Nurses at the bedside. Influencing outcomes.
Nurs Clin North Am. 1997 Sep;32(3):579-87.

引用本文的文献

1
Balanced performance measurement in research hospitals: the participative case study of a haematology department.研究型医院的平衡绩效评估:血液科的参与式案例研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 3;17(1):522. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2479-6.
2
Validation of the Mother-Generated Index in Iran: A Specific Postnatal Quality-of-Life Instrument.伊朗母亲生成指数的验证:一种特定的产后生活质量工具。
Int J Prev Med. 2013 Dec;4(12):1371-9.
3
Are all outcomes in chronic heart failure rated equally? An argument for a patient-centred approach to outcome assessment.
慢性心力衰竭的所有结局是否同等重要?一种以患者为中心的结局评估方法的观点。
Heart Fail Rev. 2014 Mar;19(2):153-62. doi: 10.1007/s10741-012-9369-0.
4
Performance measurement in healthcare: part II--state of the science findings by stage of the performance measurement process.医疗保健中的绩效评估:第二部分——按绩效评估过程阶段划分的科学现状调查结果
Healthc Policy. 2006 Jul;2(1):56-78.
5
The effect of technical support on clinician attitudes toward an outcome assessment instrument.技术支持对临床医生对一项结果评估工具态度的影响。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2002 Feb;29(1):99-108. doi: 10.1007/BF02287837.