Doumith R, Simon D, Bruet A, Vallée G
Nouv Presse Med. 1979 Oct 29;8(41):3319-23.
We have investigated the frequency of discordant results between the TRH test and classic dynamic tests of thyroid function (thyroid suppression and TSH stimulation tests) for patients presenting a diagnostic problem for hyperthyroidism. 12 patients in group I posed the problem of having a relapse of Graves' disease previously treated: a discrepancy between TRH and T3 suppression test results was observed in 17% of the cases. 10 patients in group II demonstrated the ophtalmopathy of Graves' disease without hyperthyroidism: discordance between tests results in this group was present for 20%. Finally, 25 patients in group III had a "hot" thyroid nodul apparent at thyroid scan: in 40% of the cases, the response to TRH did not lead to the same diagnosis that was suggested by the classical dynamic tests of thyroid regulation. The discrepancies observed in this work, between the results of the TRH test and those of classic dynamic tests, demonstrate that this two types of tests are not completely interchangeable, because they do not reflect exactly the same function.
我们对甲状腺功能经典动态试验(甲状腺抑制试验和促甲状腺激素刺激试验)与促甲状腺激素释放激素(TRH)试验结果不一致的频率进行了研究,这些患者存在甲亢诊断难题。第一组有12例患者曾有Graves病复发问题:17%的病例观察到TRH试验与T3抑制试验结果存在差异。第二组有10例患者表现为无甲亢的Graves病眼病:该组试验结果不一致的情况占20%。最后,第三组有25例患者甲状腺扫描显示有“热”性甲状腺结节:40%的病例中,TRH试验的结果与经典甲状腺调节动态试验提示的诊断不同。在这项研究中观察到的TRH试验结果与经典动态试验结果之间的差异表明,这两种试验并非完全可相互替代,因为它们并未准确反映相同的功能。