Shorten Allison, Donsante Jacki, Shorten Brett
Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Birth. 2002 Mar;29(1):18-27. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2002.00151.x.
The literature is tentative in establishing links between birth position and perineal outcome. Evidence is inconclusive about risks and benefits of women's options for birth position. The objective of this study was to gain further evidence to inform perinatal caregivers about the effect of birth position on perineal outcome, and to assist birth attendants in providing women with information and opportunities for minimizing perineal trauma.
Data from 2891 normal vaginal births were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were obtained for variables of interest, and cross-tabulations were generated to explore possible relationships between perineal outcomes, birth positions, and accoucheur type. Logistic regression models were used to examine potential confounding and interaction effects of relevant variables.
Multiple regression analysis revealed a statistically significant association between birth position and perineal outcome. Overall, the lateral position was associated with the highest rate of intact perineum (66.6%) and the most favorable perineal outcome profile. The squatting position was associated with the least favorable perineal outcomes (intact rate 42%), especially for primiparas. A statistically significant association was demonstrated between perineal outcome and accoucheur type. The obstetrician group generated an episiotomy rate of 26 percent, which was more than five times higher than episiotomy rates for all midwife categories. The rate for tear requiring suture of 42.1 percent for the obstetric category was 5 to 7 percentage points higher than that for midwives. Intact perineum was achieved for 31.9 percent of women delivered by obstetricians compared with 56 to 61 percent for three midwifery categories.
Findings contribute to growing evidence that birth position may affect perineal outcome. Women's childbirth experiences should reflect decisions made in partnership with midwives and obstetricians who are equipped with knowledge of risks and benefits of birthing options and skills to implement women's choices for birth. Further identification and recognition of the strategies used by midwives to achieve favorable perineal outcomes is warranted.
关于分娩体位与会阴结局之间的联系,现有文献尚无定论。关于女性分娩体位选择的风险和益处,证据并不确凿。本研究的目的是获取更多证据,为围产期护理人员提供有关分娩体位对会阴结局影响的信息,并协助助产人员为女性提供信息和机会,以尽量减少会阴创伤。
对2891例正常阴道分娩的数据进行分析。获取感兴趣变量的描述性统计数据,并生成交叉表以探讨会阴结局、分娩体位和接生人员类型之间的可能关系。使用逻辑回归模型来检验相关变量的潜在混杂和交互作用。
多元回归分析显示分娩体位与会阴结局之间存在统计学上的显著关联。总体而言,侧卧位与会阴完整率最高(66.6%)以及最有利的会阴结局相关。蹲位与会阴结局最不理想相关(完整率42%),尤其是初产妇。会阴结局与接生人员类型之间存在统计学上的显著关联。产科医生组的会阴切开率为26%,比所有助产士类别的会阴切开率高出五倍多。产科类别中需要缝合的撕裂率为42.1%,比助产士高出5至7个百分点。产科医生接生的女性中有31.9%会阴完整,而三个助产士类别为56%至61%。
研究结果进一步证明分娩体位可能会影响会阴结局。女性的分娩经历应反映出与助产士和产科医生共同做出的决定,这些专业人员应具备有关分娩选择的风险和益处的知识以及实施女性分娩选择的技能。有必要进一步识别并认可助产士用于实现良好会阴结局的策略。