Sebire N J, Rees H, Paradinas F, Seckl M, Newlands E
Department of Histopathology, Imperial College School of Medicine at Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London, UK.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Dec;18(6):662-5. doi: 10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00589.x.
Early ultrasound examination is being used increasingly in the diagnosis of molar pregnancy. The aim of this study was to examine the diagnostic implications of routine ultrasound examination for histologically confirmed molar pregnancies.
This was a retrospective review of sonographic and histological findings in a series of consecutive cases referred to the National Trophoblastic Disease Surveillance Centre with suspected molar pregnancies. In 194 cases referred to the center over a 6-month period in whom results of a preceding ultrasound examination were documented, review of ultrasound findings and final histological diagnosis was carried out.
There were 155 cases with a reviewed histological diagnosis of complete or partial hydatidiform mole. In 131 (67%) cases, the sonographic diagnosis was that of a missed miscarriage/anembryonic pregnancy with no documented suspicion of molar pregnancy, referral being on the basis of histological examination of products of conception. In 63 cases, ultrasound examination suggested molar pregnancy; in 53 (84%) of these, the diagnosis of molar pregnancy was correct. Overall, 37 of 64 (58%) complete moles had sonographic evidence of molar pregnancy compared to 16 of 91 (17%) partial moles. Of 155 histologically confirmed complete or partial hydatidiform moles, only 53 (34%) were suspected as molar sonographically.
The majority of cases of molar pregnancy now present as missed miscarriage/anembryonic pregnancy sonographically, highlighting the importance of histological examination to diagnose gestational trophoblastic disease.
早期超声检查在葡萄胎妊娠诊断中的应用日益增多。本研究旨在探讨常规超声检查对经组织学确诊的葡萄胎妊娠的诊断意义。
这是一项对一系列连续转诊至国家滋养细胞疾病监测中心、疑似葡萄胎妊娠病例的超声和组织学检查结果的回顾性研究。在6个月内转诊至该中心的194例病例中,记录了先前超声检查的结果,并对超声检查结果和最终组织学诊断进行了回顾。
155例经组织学诊断为完全性或部分性葡萄胎。131例(67%)超声诊断为稽留流产/胚胎停育,无葡萄胎妊娠的记录怀疑,转诊是基于对妊娠产物的组织学检查。63例超声检查提示为葡萄胎妊娠;其中53例(84%)葡萄胎妊娠诊断正确。总体而言,64例完全性葡萄胎中有37例(58%)有葡萄胎妊娠的超声证据,而91例部分性葡萄胎中有16例(17%)有此证据。在155例经组织学确诊的完全性或部分性葡萄胎中,超声仅怀疑53例(34%)。
目前大多数葡萄胎妊娠病例在超声检查中表现为稽留流产/胚胎停育,突出了组织学检查对诊断妊娠滋养细胞疾病的重要性。