Egan N, Loesche M C, Baker M M
International Research Services, Inc, Rockland, Maine, USA.
Cutis. 2001 Oct;68(4 Suppl):20-4.
Poor patient compliance is one of the main reasons for treatment failure in acne. Our objective was to evaluate the tolerability and patient preference of adapalene gel 0.1% compared with tretinoin microsphere gel 0.1% using a randomized, controlled, investigator-masked, bilateral (split-face), 4-week comparative study of the 2 products when applied once daily in 40 patients. We found that adapalene produced less stinging/burning than tretinoin at weeks 1 and 4 and, overall, more patients felt more skin irritation on the side of the face treated with tretinoin than on the side treated with adapalene (P<.05). At week 4, a significantly greater number of patients preferred adapalene gel 0.1% to tretinoin microsphere gel 0.1% (72.5% vs 27.5%, respectively, P<.01).
患者依从性差是痤疮治疗失败的主要原因之一。我们的目的是通过一项随机、对照、研究者设盲、双侧(半脸)、为期4周的比较研究,评估0.1%阿达帕林凝胶与0.1%维甲酸微球凝胶在40例患者中每日使用一次时的耐受性和患者偏好。我们发现,在第1周和第4周时,阿达帕林引起的刺痛/烧灼感比特维甲酸少,总体而言,与使用阿达帕林治疗的一侧相比,更多患者感觉使用维甲酸治疗的一侧面部皮肤刺激更明显(P<0.05)。在第4周时,明显更多的患者更喜欢0.1%阿达帕林凝胶而非0.1%维甲酸微球凝胶(分别为72.5%和27.5%,P<0.01)。