Monneret Guillaume, Benoit Yves, Debard Anne Lise, Gutowski Marie C, Topenot Ingrid, Bienvenu Jacques
Immunology Laboratory, Lyon-Sud University Hospital, Pierre-Bénite, France.
Clin Immunol. 2002 Feb;102(2):192-9. doi: 10.1006/clim.2001.5156.
Allergic or pseudoallergic reactions that occur during anesthesia have been increasing for the last few years. To date, the diagnosis of allergy to muscle relaxants remains difficult. In this respect, we developed a flow cytometric method for the study of drug-induced basophil degranulation using CD63 and CCR3. Fifty patients who developed clinical features evocative of allergic reactions immediately after induction of anesthesia were included and classified into two groups. Group 1 (n = 39) comprised true allergic patients, who developed typical signs of shock associated to positive skin testing. Group 2 (n = 11) consisted of patients whose clinical history was not typical and skin testing was negative or nonconclusive. Seventeen control subjects were also studied in this report. We compared data from flow cytometry to skin tests, specific IgE, and histamine release results. Flow cytometry showed a sensitivity of 54%, while that of specific IgE was similar, at 62%. Interestingly, when considering the sensitivity of IgE + CD63 for diagnosis, we reached a sensitivity value of 80%. Of 15 negative results for specific IgE, we found 7 positive CD63 tests, while histamine release gave positive results in only 2 cases. Furthermore, the CD63 protocol showed good specificity (100%). We conclude that our flow cytometry protocol is a promising tool in allergy diagnosis since it is specific and complementary to specific IgE detection.
在过去几年中,麻醉期间发生的过敏或类过敏反应一直在增加。迄今为止,对肌肉松弛剂过敏的诊断仍然困难。在这方面,我们开发了一种流式细胞术方法,用于使用CD63和CCR3研究药物诱导的嗜碱性粒细胞脱颗粒。纳入了50例在麻醉诱导后立即出现疑似过敏反应临床特征的患者,并将其分为两组。第1组(n = 39)包括真正的过敏患者,他们出现了与皮肤试验阳性相关的典型休克体征。第2组(n = 11)由临床病史不典型且皮肤试验阴性或不确定的患者组成。本报告还研究了17名对照受试者。我们将流式细胞术的数据与皮肤试验、特异性IgE和组胺释放结果进行了比较。流式细胞术显示敏感性为54%,而特异性IgE的敏感性相似,为62%。有趣的是,当考虑IgE + CD63诊断的敏感性时,我们达到了80%的敏感性值。在特异性IgE的15个阴性结果中,我们发现7个CD63试验呈阳性,而组胺释放仅在2例中呈阳性结果。此外,CD63检测方案显示出良好的特异性(100%)。我们得出结论,我们的流式细胞术检测方案是过敏诊断中有前景的工具,因为它具有特异性且是特异性IgE检测的补充。