• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾盂肾盏结石负荷:影响肾盂结石体外冲击波碎石术治疗效果的一个因素。

Pelvicalyceal stone load: a factor affecting the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal pelvic calculi.

作者信息

Küpeli B, Tunç L, Alkibay T, Karaoglan U, Bozkirli I

机构信息

Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Gazi University, M. Kemal Mah./Eskisehir Yolu, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2001 Dec;88(9):854-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.01275.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.01275.x
PMID:11851602
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of variations in pelvicalyceal volume on the results of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and the relationship of stone load to estimated pelvicalyceal volume in patients with renal pelvic stones.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 204 patients with renal pelvic stones were treated primarily by ESWL. Exclusion criteria were radiolucent stones, dilatation of the renal collecting system, JJ stent insertion before ESWL and an inadequate follow-up. The surface area of the stones and the renal collecting system were measured using a grid of 1 mm2 divisions. The pelvicalyceal volume was calculated as 0.6 (area)1.27. To evaluate the treatment results a pelvicalyceal stone load (PSL) index, describing the relationship of stone load to total estimated pelvicalyceal volume, was defined as stone volume/renal collecting system volume.

RESULTS

The mean (range) pelvicalyceal volume of the patients was 13.24 (4.12-28.47) mm3 and the mean PSL index was 26.2%. The cumulative success rates according to the PSL decreased from 97% to 90% with increasing PSL, but remained at > 95% in patients with a PSL index of < 50%. In all, 184 sessions were applied and the session/patient ratio increased from 1.41 to 3.0 with increasing PSL. Complications were acute pyelonephritis in three and steinstrasse in five patients.

CONCLUSION

The PSL index appears to be a more accurate and reproducible method for predicting the outcome of ESWL, and has the advantage of considering the effect of pelvicalyceal anatomy.

摘要

目的

确定肾盂肾盏容积变化对体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)结果的影响,以及肾盂结石患者结石负荷与估计肾盂肾盏容积之间的关系。

患者与方法

总共204例肾盂结石患者主要接受ESWL治疗。排除标准为阴性结石、肾集合系统扩张、ESWL前插入双J支架以及随访不充分。使用1mm²方格测量结石和肾集合系统的表面积。肾盂肾盏容积计算为0.6×(面积)^1.27。为评估治疗结果,定义了一个肾盂结石负荷(PSL)指数,用于描述结石负荷与估计的肾盂肾盏总体积之间的关系,即结石体积/肾集合系统体积。

结果

患者的平均(范围)肾盂肾盏容积为13.24(4.12 - 28.47)mm³,平均PSL指数为26.2%。随着PSL增加,根据PSL的累积成功率从97%降至90%,但PSL指数<50%的患者累积成功率仍>95%。总共进行了184次治疗,随着PSL增加,治疗次数/患者比例从1.41增加到3.0。并发症包括3例急性肾盂肾炎和5例石街形成。

结论

PSL指数似乎是一种更准确且可重复的预测ESWL结果的方法,并且具有考虑肾盂肾盏解剖结构影响的优势。

相似文献

1
Pelvicalyceal stone load: a factor affecting the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal pelvic calculi.肾盂肾盏结石负荷:影响肾盂结石体外冲击波碎石术治疗效果的一个因素。
BJU Int. 2001 Dec;88(9):854-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.01275.x.
2
The outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal pelvic stone with and without JJ stent--a comparative study.有或无双J支架的体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾盂结石的疗效——一项对比研究
J Pak Med Assoc. 2009 Mar;59(3):143-6.
3
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of renal pelvicalyceal stones in morbidly obese patients.体外冲击波碎石术治疗病态肥胖患者肾盂肾盏结石
Int Braz J Urol. 2005 Mar-Apr;31(2):105-10. doi: 10.1590/s1677-55382005000200003.
4
Efficacy of commercialised extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy service: a review of 589 renal stones.商业化体外冲击波碎石术服务的疗效:对589例肾结石的回顾
BMC Urol. 2017 Jul 27;17(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0249-8.
5
A 970 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves patients' selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective study.非增强计算机断层扫描(NCCT)上肾结石密度 970 亨氏单位(HU)的阈值可改善患者对体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)的选择:来自前瞻性研究的证据。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt B):E438-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10964.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
6
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of lower calyx calculi: how much is treatment outcome influenced by the anatomy of the collecting system?下盏结石的体外冲击波碎石术:集合系统的解剖结构对治疗结果有多大影响?
Eur Urol. 2007 Aug;52(2):539-46. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.03.058. Epub 2007 Mar 28.
7
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy for selected staghorn stones.体外冲击波碎石术单疗法治疗特定的鹿角形结石。
Singapore Med J. 1995 Feb;36(1):53-5.
8
Predictors of success after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for renal calculi between 20-30 mm: a multivariate analysis model.20至30毫米肾结石体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)后成功的预测因素:多变量分析模型
ScientificWorldJournal. 2006 Mar 23;6:2388-95. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2006.370.
9
Staghorn calculi: analysis of treatment results between initial percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy with reference to surface area.鹿角形结石:参照表面积分析初始经皮肾镜取石术与体外冲击波碎石术单一疗法的治疗结果
J Urol. 1992 May;147(5):1219-25. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37522-5.
10
Outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy monotherapy for large renal calculi: effect of stone and collecting system surface areas and cost-effectiveness of treatment.
J Endourol. 1995 Feb;9(1):9-13. doi: 10.1089/end.1995.9.9.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of outcomes of renal stones from stone characteristics after shock-wave lithotripsy: is unenhanced helical computed tomography better?
Eur Radiol. 2006 Mar;16(3):759; author reply 760-1. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-2876-9. Epub 2005 Aug 16.