Fischer J, Mathieson C
Lehigh Valley Hospital, Allentown, Pennsylvania, USA.
Crit Care Nurs Q. 2001 Feb;23(4):52-8. doi: 10.1097/00002727-200102000-00005.
The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) has been the gold standard of neurologic assessment for trauma patients since its development by Jennett and Teasdale in the early 1970s. The GCS was found to be a simple tool to use. It became the method of choice for trauma care practitioners to document neurologic findings over time and predict functional outcome. Although the scale has been shown to be effective, many authors have cited weaknesses in the scale including the inability to predict outcome, variation in inter-rater reliability, and the inconsistent use by caregivers in the prehospital and hospital settings. This article outlines the components of the GCS and how practitioners can best use the scale, particularly in patients whose injuries and treatments make them difficult to assess.
自20世纪70年代初由詹尼特和蒂斯代尔开发以来,格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)一直是创伤患者神经学评估的金标准。人们发现GCS是一种易于使用的工具。它成为创伤护理从业者记录神经学检查结果随时间变化情况并预测功能预后的首选方法。尽管该量表已被证明是有效的,但许多作者指出了该量表存在的弱点,包括无法预测预后、不同评估者之间可靠性存在差异以及院前和医院环境中护理人员使用不一致等问题。本文概述了GCS的组成部分以及从业者如何最好地使用该量表,特别是对于那些因受伤和治疗而难以评估的患者。