Suppr超能文献

昏迷患者的临床量表:历史背景下的格拉斯哥昏迷量表与新的FOUR评分

Clinical scales for comatose patients: the Glasgow Coma Scale in historical context and the new FOUR Score.

作者信息

Wijdicks Eelco F M

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

Rev Neurol Dis. 2006 Summer;3(3):109-17.

Abstract

The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) has been the gold standard for assessing the level of consciousness in patients with significant brain injury. Prior efforts to modify or replace this scale have been unsuccessful because no scale could improve on its simplicity and practical usefulness. This review provides a historical perspective on coma scales and introduces a new and simple, but more comprehensive, scale: the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) Score, which has been recently validated. The FOUR Score has 4 components with "4" as a maximal score for each item. The individual components are eye responses (eye opening and eye tracking), motor responses (responses to pain and following simple hand commands), brainstem reflexes (pupil, cornea, and cough reflexes), and respiration (breathing rhythm and respiratory drive in ventilated patients). The FOUR Score is a further improvement on previous scales for classifying and communicating impaired consciousness.

摘要

格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)一直是评估重度脑损伤患者意识水平的金标准。此前修改或取代该量表的努力均未成功,因为没有哪种量表能在其简单性和实用性上更胜一筹。本综述提供了昏迷量表的历史视角,并介绍了一种新的、简单但更全面的量表:无反应性全面大纲(FOUR)评分,该评分最近已得到验证。FOUR评分有4个组成部分,每个项目的最高分均为“4”分。各个组成部分包括眼部反应(睁眼和眼球追踪)、运动反应(对疼痛的反应和对简单手部指令的遵循)、脑干反射(瞳孔、角膜和咳嗽反射)以及呼吸(呼吸节律和通气患者的呼吸驱动)。FOUR评分是对以往用于分类和传达意识障碍的量表的进一步改进。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验