Walden B E, Montgomery A A
J Speech Hear Res. 1975 Sep;18(3):444-55. doi: 10.1044/jshr.1803.444.
Judgments of consonant similarity were obtained from subjects who had normal hearing, high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss, or relatively flat sensorineural hearing loss. The individual differences model through program INDSCAL was used to derive a set of perceptual features empirically from the similarity judgments, and to group the subjects on the basis of strength of feature usage. The analysis revealed that sonorance was the dominant dimension in the similarity judgments of the subjects with high-frequency hearing losses, while sibilance tended to dominate the judgments of the subjects with flat audiometric configurations. The normal-hearing subjects tended to weight these two dimensions approximately equally. These differences in similarity judgments were observed based upon audiometric configuration, despite the fact that the two hearing-impaired groups were not unique in word-recognition ability.
从听力正常、高频感音神经性听力损失或相对平坦型感音神经性听力损失的受试者那里获得了辅音相似性判断结果。通过INDSCAL程序的个体差异模型,从相似性判断中凭经验得出了一组感知特征,并根据特征使用强度对受试者进行分组。分析表明,响亮度是高频听力损失受试者相似性判断中的主导维度,而咝音性往往在听力图呈平坦型的受试者判断中占主导。听力正常的受试者倾向于对这两个维度给予大致相同的权重。尽管两个听力受损组在单词识别能力方面并非独一无二,但基于听力图配置观察到了相似性判断中的这些差异。