Suppr超能文献

迷走神经刺激治疗部分性癫痫发作。

Vagus nerve stimulation for partial seizures.

作者信息

Privitera M D, Welty T E, Ficker D M, Welge J

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center (525), 231 Albert B. Sabin Way, Cincinnati, Ohio 45267-0525, USA.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(1):CD002896. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002896.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has recently been introduced as an adjunct for treating patients with seizures. The aim of this systematic review was to overview the current evidence for the effects of vagus nerve stimulation, when used as an adjunctive treatment for patients with drug-resistant partial epilepsy.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of VNS high-level stimulation compared to low-level (presumed subtherapeutic dose) stimulation.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group trials register, MEDLINE (January 1966 to October 2000) and The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2000).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized, double-blind controlled trials of VNS comparing high and low stimulation paradigms. Studies in adults or children with drug-resistant partial seizures.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently selected trials for inclusion and extracted data. The following outcomes were assessed: (a) 50% or greater reduction in total seizure frequency; (b) treatment withdrawal (any reason); (c) side effects. Primary analyses were intention to treat. Sensitivity best and worst case analyses were also undertaken. Summary odds ratios (ORs) were estimated for each outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

Results of the overall efficacy analysis show that VNS stimulation using the high stimulation paradigm was significantly better than low stimulation. The overall OR (95% Confidence Interval (CI)) for 50% responders across all studies is 1.93 (1.1,3.3). This effect did not vary substantially and remained statistically significant for both the best and worst case scenarios. Results for the outcome "withdrawal of allocated treatment" suggest that VNS is well tolerated as no significant difference was found between the high and low stimulation groups, and withdrawals were rare. Statistically significant adverse effects associated with implantation (low versus baseline) were hoarseness, cough, pain and paresthesia. Statistically significant adverse effects associated with stimulation (high versus low) were hoarseness and dyspnea, suggesting the implantation is associated with hoarseness, but the stimulation produces additional hoarseness.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: VNS for partial seizures appears to be an effective and well tolerated treatment. Adverse effects of hoarseness, cough, pain, paresthesias and dyspnea are associated with the treatment but appear to be reasonably well tolerated as dropouts were rare. Typical central nervous system adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs such as ataxia, dizziness, fatigue, nausea and somnolence were not statistically significantly associated with VNS treatment.

摘要

背景

迷走神经刺激术(VNS)最近已被引入作为治疗癫痫患者的一种辅助手段。本系统评价的目的是概述当迷走神经刺激术用作耐药性部分性癫痫患者的辅助治疗时,其效果的当前证据。

目的

确定与低水平(假定为亚治疗剂量)刺激相比,VNS高水平刺激的效果。

检索策略

我们检索了Cochrane癫痫组试验注册库、MEDLINE(1966年1月至2000年10月)和Cochrane对照试验注册库(Cochrane图书馆2000年第4期)。

选择标准

比较VNS高刺激模式和低刺激模式的随机、双盲对照试验。针对患有耐药性部分性癫痫发作的成人或儿童的研究。

数据收集与分析

两名评价员独立选择纳入试验并提取数据。评估了以下结局:(a)总癫痫发作频率降低50%或更多;(b)治疗退出(任何原因);(c)副作用。主要分析为意向性分析。还进行了敏感性最佳和最差情况分析。对每个结局估计了汇总比值比(OR)。

主要结果

总体疗效分析结果表明,使用高刺激模式的VNS刺激明显优于低刺激。所有研究中50%有反应者的总体OR(95%置信区间(CI))为1.93(1.1,3.3)。这种效应没有显著差异,在最佳和最差情况下均保持统计学显著性。“分配治疗的退出”结局的结果表明,VNS耐受性良好,因为高刺激组和低刺激组之间未发现显著差异,且退出情况很少见。与植入相关的具有统计学显著性的不良反应(低水平与基线相比)为声音嘶哑、咳嗽、疼痛和感觉异常。与刺激相关的具有统计学显著性的不良反应(高水平与低水平相比)为声音嘶哑和呼吸困难,这表明植入与声音嘶哑有关,但刺激会产生额外的声音嘶哑。

评价员结论

VNS用于部分性癫痫发作似乎是一种有效且耐受性良好的治疗方法。声音嘶哑、咳嗽、疼痛、感觉异常和呼吸困难等不良反应与该治疗相关,但由于退出情况很少见,似乎耐受性较好。抗癫痫药物典型的中枢神经系统不良反应,如共济失调、头晕、疲劳、恶心和嗜睡,与VNS治疗无统计学显著相关性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验