Wang Xiaojun, Minasov George, Shoichet Brian K
Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Biological Chemistry, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611-3008, USA.
Proteins. 2002 Apr 1;47(1):86-96.
The class A beta-lactamase TEM-1 is a key bacterial resistance enzyme against beta-lactam antibiotics, but little is known about the energetic bases for complementarity between TEM-1 and its inhibitors. Most inhibitors form a covalent adduct with the catalytic Ser70, making the measurement of equilibrium constants, and hence interaction energies, technically difficult. This study evaluates noncovalent interactions within covalent complexes by examining the differential stability of TEM-1 and its inhibitor adducts. The thermal denaturation of TEM-1 follows a two-state, reversible model with a melting temperature (T(m)) of 51.6C and a van't Hoff enthalpy of unfolding (DeltaH(VH)) of 146.2 kcal/mol at pH 7.0. The stability of the enzyme changes on forming an inhibitor adduct. As expected, some inhibitors stabilize TEM-1; transition-state analogues increase the T(m) by up to 3.7C (1.7 kcal/mol). Surprisingly, all beta-lactam covalent acyl--enzyme complexes tested destabilize TEM-1 significantly relative to the apo-enzyme. For instance, the clinically used inhibitor clavulanic acid and the beta-lactamase-resistant beta-lactams moxalactam and imipenem destabilize TEM-1 by over 2.6C (1.2 kcal/mol) in their covalent adducts. Based on the structure of the TEM-1/imipenem complex (Maveyraud et al., J Am Chem Soc 1998;120:9748--52), destabilization by moxalactam and imipenem is thought to be caused by a steric clash between the side-chain of Asn132 and the 6(7)-alpha group of these beta-lactams. To test this hypothesis, the mutant enzyme N132A was made. In contrast with wild-type, the covalent complexes between N132A and both imipenem and moxalactam stabilize the enzyme, consistent with the hypothesis. To investigate the structural bases of this dramatic change in stability, the structure of N132A/imipenem was determined by X-ray crystallography. In the complex with N132A, imipenem adopts a very different conformation from that observed in the wild-type complex, and the putative destabilizing interaction with residue 132 is relieved. Studies of several enzymes suggest that beta-lactams, and covalent inhibitors in general, can have either net favorable or net unfavorable noncovalent interaction energies within the covalent complex. In the case of TEM-1, such unfavorable interactions convert substrate analogues into very effective inhibitors.
A类β-内酰胺酶TEM-1是细菌对抗β-内酰胺抗生素的关键耐药酶,但对于TEM-1与其抑制剂之间互补性的能量基础却知之甚少。大多数抑制剂与催化性的Ser70形成共价加合物,这使得平衡常数的测定以及相互作用能的测定在技术上变得困难。本研究通过检测TEM-1及其抑制剂加合物的差异稳定性来评估共价复合物中的非共价相互作用。TEM-1的热变性遵循两态可逆模型,在pH 7.0时,其解链温度(T(m))为51.6℃,解链的范特霍夫焓(ΔH(VH))为146.2 kcal/mol。形成抑制剂加合物后,酶的稳定性会发生变化。正如预期的那样,一些抑制剂能使TEM-1稳定;过渡态类似物可使T(m)升高多达3.7℃(1.7 kcal/mol)。令人惊讶的是,所有测试的β-内酰胺共价酰基-酶复合物相对于无辅基酶而言,都会使TEM-1显著不稳定。例如,临床使用的抑制剂克拉维酸以及耐β-内酰胺酶的β-内酰胺类药物莫西沙星和亚胺培南,在其共价加合物中会使TEM-1不稳定超过2.6℃(1.2 kcal/mol)。基于TEM-1/亚胺培南复合物的结构(Maveyraud等人,《美国化学会志》1998年;120:9748 - 52),莫西沙星和亚胺培南导致的不稳定被认为是由Asn132的侧链与这些β-内酰胺的6(7)-α基团之间的空间冲突引起的。为了验证这一假设,构建了突变酶N132A。与野生型相反,N132A与亚胺培南和莫西沙星形成的共价复合物都使酶稳定,这与假设一致。为了研究这种稳定性显著变化的结构基础,通过X射线晶体学确定了N132A/亚胺培南的结构。在与N132A形成的复合物中,亚胺培南采用了与野生型复合物中观察到的非常不同的构象,并且与132位残基的假定不稳定相互作用得到缓解。对几种酶的研究表明,β-内酰胺类药物以及一般的共价抑制剂,在共价复合物中可能具有净有利或净不利的非共价相互作用能。就TEM-1而言,这种不利的相互作用将底物类似物转化为非常有效的抑制剂。