• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教条主义者在训练小组环境中的认知与行为。

Perceptions and behaviors of dogmatic subjects in a T-group setting.

作者信息

Davis T B, Frye R L, Joure S

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 1975 Oct;41(2):375-81. doi: 10.2466/pms.1975.41.2.375.

DOI:10.2466/pms.1975.41.2.375
PMID:1187293
Abstract

Ss scoring 1 SD above or below the mean of the Rokeach Dogmatism Scale, Form E participated. During 12 hr. of training, Ss' behaviors were recorded by observers and each S was periodically rated by his peers on his perceived level of contributions to the group process. Significant differences were found between high and low dogmatics in the behaviors exhibited during the T-groups. Low dogmatics were more self-revealing, more attentive to the here-and-now aspects of the T-group, less apt to give negative feedback, and less likely to reject the group. A significant curvilinear relation was found between peer ratings and behavior in the T-group, with Ss who were rated extremely by their peers being more self-revealing, more attentive to the here-and-now of the group, more apt to give negative feedback, and less likely to reject the group verbally.

摘要

得分高于或低于罗基奇教条主义量表E型均值一个标准差的被试参与了实验。在12小时的训练期间,观察者记录被试的行为,并且每个被试会被其同伴定期评价其在小组过程中所感知到的贡献水平。在T小组中表现出的行为方面,高教条主义者和低教条主义者之间发现了显著差异。低教条主义者更自我表露,更关注T小组当下的方面,不太容易给出负面反馈,也不太可能拒绝小组。在同伴评价和T小组中的行为之间发现了显著的曲线关系,被同伴极高评价的被试更自我表露,更关注小组当下,更倾向于给出负面反馈,并且不太可能口头拒绝小组。

相似文献

1
Perceptions and behaviors of dogmatic subjects in a T-group setting.教条主义者在训练小组环境中的认知与行为。
Percept Mot Skills. 1975 Oct;41(2):375-81. doi: 10.2466/pms.1975.41.2.375.
2
Differential T-group behaviors of high and low dogmatic participants.
J Psychol. 1972 Jul;81(2d Half):301-9. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1972.9916954.
3
Dogmatism as a mediating influence on the perception of risk in consumer choice decisions.教条主义作为消费者选择决策中风险认知的中介影响因素。
J Psychol. 1977 Jan;95(1st Half):131-8. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1977.9915869.
4
Microteaching, feedback, dogmatism, and nonverbal perceptiveness.微格教学、反馈、教条主义和非语言感知能力。
J Psychol. 1977 Mar;95(2d Half):231-5. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1977.9915885.
5
A comparison of aggressive-rejected and nonaggressive-rejected children's interpretations of self-directed and other-directed rejection.攻击性被拒斥儿童与非攻击性被拒斥儿童对自我指向性和他人指向性拒斥的理解比较。
Child Dev. 1996 Jun;67(3):1048-70.
6
Relationships between tattling, likeability, and social classification: a preliminary investigation of adolescents in residential care.告状、受欢迎程度与社会分类之间的关系:对寄宿照料机构青少年的初步调查
Behav Modif. 2004 May;28(3):331-48. doi: 10.1177/0145445503258985.
7
Effects of diagnostic labels and subject dogmatism upon the perception of persons.诊断标签和主体教条主义对人物认知的影响。
Percept Mot Skills. 1978 Oct;47(2):583-8. doi: 10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.583.
8
Effects of a negative social experience on the emotional and social-cognitive responses of aggressive-rejected children.负面社交经历对攻击性被拒儿童情绪和社会认知反应的影响。
Percept Mot Skills. 1989 Oct;69(2):371-82. doi: 10.2466/pms.1989.69.2.371.
9
Hostile attributions and behavioral strategies in children: does relationship type matter?儿童的敌意归因与行为策略:关系类型有影响吗?
Dev Psychol. 2007 Jul;43(4):889-900. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.4.889.
10
Comparison of publicly delivered and anonymously delivered verbal feedback in brief personal growth groups.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1977 Jun;45(3):385-90. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.45.3.385.