Cody William K, Mitchell Gail J
University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd., Charlotte, NC 29922, USA.
Nurs Sci Q. 2002 Jan;15(1):4-13. doi: 10.1177/08943180222108705.
The human science tradition is rooted in human freedom and meaning and oriented toward narrative and dialogical methods. In the past 10 years, human science nursing has grown but the opposition has also increased. Whereas other health disciplines are turning to the study of lived experience, nursing on the whole may be turning away. This article updates progress in human science, including works related to major nursing theories. The authors address practical and political considerations related to language, community, theory-laden knowledge, and tolerance for diversity. The authors conclude that the suppression of human science imperils nursing as a practice of being-with, witnessing, and cocreating quality of life, lived by nurses. But theories live in the actions of those who support them; thus, any place where people seek human care has the potential to support a human science-based nursing practice.
人文科学传统植根于人类自由与意义，并以叙事和对话方法为导向。在过去十年中，人文科学护理有所发展，但反对的声音也在增加。其他健康学科正在转向对生活体验的研究，而整体上护理领域可能正在背离这一方向。本文介绍了人文科学的进展，包括与主要护理理论相关的著作。作者探讨了与语言、社区、理论负载知识以及对多样性的包容相关的实践和政治考量。作者得出结论，对人文科学的压制危及护理作为一种与患者同在、见证并共同创造生活质量的实践，而这正是护士所践行的。但理论存在于支持它们的人的行动之中；因此，任何人们寻求人文关怀的地方都有可能支持基于人文科学的护理实践。
