Simeoni U, Lacroze V, Leclaire M, Millet V
Département de Néonatologie, Hôpital de La Timone-Enfants et Hôpital de la Conception, Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de Marseille, 264, rue Saint-Pierre, 13385 Marseille.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2001 Oct;30(6 Suppl):S58-63.
How far providing neonatal intensive care to extremely low birth weight infants is appropriate is still a highly controversial issue. Decision making when a poor prognosis has been established may be facilitated by consensus based recommendations and rigorous procedures. In the very majority of situations, the provision of intensive care is advocated at birth a priori. A decision of treatment withholding or withdrawal may eventually be made secondarily, in the case major neurological complications, likely to induce severe long term deficits, are evidenced. In any case, an ethical policy focused on each infant's best interest is justified, while the adoption of a systematic, gestational age or birth weight based restriction of access to intensive care may not be acceptable in most countries. Rigorous criteria must be fulfilled for end of life decision making and procedures. Continuous assistance to the patient and to the parents is key determinant.
为极低出生体重儿提供新生儿重症监护的适宜程度仍是一个极具争议的问题。当已确定预后不良时,基于共识的建议和严格程序可能有助于做出决策。在绝大多数情况下,出生时就先验地主张提供重症监护。只有在出现可能导致严重长期缺陷的重大神经并发症时,才可能最终做出停止或撤销治疗的决定。无论如何,以每个婴儿的最大利益为重点的伦理政策是合理的,而在大多数国家,采用基于孕周或出生体重的系统性限制重症监护准入的做法可能不可接受。做出临终决策和程序必须满足严格标准。持续为患者及其父母提供帮助是关键决定因素。