Suppr超能文献

一项关于根管治疗后磨牙中粘结式银汞合金冠根核周围冠部微渗漏的体外研究。

An in vitro study of coronal microleakage around bonded amalgam coronal-radicular cores in endodontically treated molar teeth.

作者信息

Howdle Mark David, Fox Kathryn, Youngson Callum Cormack

机构信息

St Ann's Dental Clinic, 14 St Ann's Square, Manchester M2 7HQ, England.

出版信息

Quintessence Int. 2002 Jan;33(1):22-9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the coronal microleakage of conventional and bonded amalgam coronal-radicular (Nayyar) restorations on endodontically treated molar teeth, because coronal seal is a major factor in the long-term success of endodontic treatment.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Forty extracted human molar teeth were root-filled and prepared for coronal-radicular amalgam restorations. Four groups of 10 teeth were restored with Tytin amalgam and Vitrebond, Superbond D Liner II, Panavia 21, or no adhesive agent. The teeth were placed in India ink for 1 week, and then demineralized and rendered transparent. The ink penetration was assessed with a coded scoring system.

RESULTS

The bonded amalgam groups produced significantly less leakage than did the nonbonded group. No statistically significant differences in leakage were detected among the bonded amalgam groups.

CONCLUSION

To prevent the reinfection of the endodontically treated molar, it may be preferable to restore the tooth immediately after obturation by employing a bonded amalgam coronal-radicular technique.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较常规汞合金和粘结式汞合金冠根(Nayyar)修复体在根管治疗后的磨牙上的冠部微渗漏情况,因为冠部封闭是根管治疗长期成功的一个主要因素。

方法和材料

四十颗拔除的人磨牙进行根管充填,并预备冠根汞合金修复体。四组,每组十颗牙齿,分别用Tytin汞合金和Vitrebond、Superbond D Liner II、Panavia 21修复,或不使用粘结剂。将牙齿置于印度墨水中1周,然后脱矿并使其透明。用编码评分系统评估墨水渗透情况。

结果

粘结式汞合金组的渗漏明显少于非粘结组。粘结式汞合金组之间未检测到渗漏的统计学显著差异。

结论

为防止根管治疗后的磨牙再次感染,采用粘结式汞合金冠根技术在充填后立即修复牙齿可能更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验