• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尿核基质蛋白-22和膀胱肿瘤抗原检测与尿脱落细胞学检查在膀胱癌检测及随访中的比较:假阳性结果的预后价值

A comparison of urinary nuclear matrix protein-22 and bladder tumour antigen tests with voided urinary cytology in detecting and following bladder cancer: the prognostic value of false-positive results.

作者信息

Poulakis V, Witzsch U, De Vries R, Altmannsberger H M, Manyak M J, Becht E

机构信息

Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, Hospital Nordwest, Academic Hospital of Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2001 Nov;88(7):692-701. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.02355.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.02355.x
PMID:11890239
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of the nuclear matrix protein-22 (NMP22) and bladder tumour antigen (BTAstat) tests compared with voided urinary cytology (VUC) in detecting and following bladder cancer, assessing particularly the prognostic value of false-positive test results in patients followed up for bladder cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 739 patients suspected of having bladder cancer, voided urine samples for the NMP22 and BTAstat tests, and for VUC and urine analysis, were collected before cystoscopy. All patients underwent transurethral resection of bladder lesions or mapping. and were followed for a mean (range) of 27.3 (3-65) months.

RESULTS

In the 406 patients with bladder cancer, the overall sensitivity was 85% for NMP22, 70% for BTAstat and 62% for VUC. For histological grades 1-3 the sensitivity in detecting transitional cell carcinoma was 82%, 89% and 94% for NMP22, 53%, 76% and 90% for BTAstat, and 38%, 68% and 90% for VUC, respectively. Although the sensitivity in detecting invasive carcinoma was >85% for all the tests. NMP22 and BTAstat were statistically more sensitive than VUC for superficial tumours. The optimal threshold value for NMP22, calculated using the receiver operating characteristics curve was 8.25 U/mL. The specificity was 68% for NMP22, 67% for BTAstat, and 96% for VUC. The specificity of VUC remained >87% and was independent of benign histological findings. In contrast, in patients with no apparent genitourinary disease on histology, NMP22 and BTAstat had significantly higher specificity (94% and 92%, respectively: P=0.003) than in the group with chronic cystitis (52% for both tests). Forty patients having no bladder cancer at biopsy had a recurrence after a mean (range) follow-up of 7.7 (3-15) months: all had a previous history of bladder cancer. According to subsequent recurrence, the prognostic positive and negative predictive values were 18% and 91% for NMP22, 13% and 88% for BTAstat, and 79% and 91% for VUC. Both false-positive VUC and NMP22 tests predicted recurrence (log-rank test, P<0.001 and P=0.004, respectively), but the BTAstat test produced no similar correlation (P=0.778).

CONCLUSION

The NMP22 and BTAstat tests are better than VUC for detecting superficial and low-grade bladder cancer but they have significantly lower specificity. After excluding diseases with the potential to interfere in these tests the overall specificity of both tests is increased considerably. False-positive results from NMP22 and VUC but not from BTAstat in patients followed up for bladder cancer correlate with future recurrences.

摘要

目的

评估核基质蛋白-22(NMP22)和膀胱肿瘤抗原(BTAstat)检测与排尿细胞学检查(VUC)相比,在膀胱癌检测及随访中的诊断和预后价值,尤其评估膀胱癌随访患者中假阳性检测结果的预后价值。

患者与方法

对739例疑似膀胱癌患者,在膀胱镜检查前采集排尿样本进行NMP22和BTAstat检测、VUC及尿液分析。所有患者均接受经尿道膀胱病变切除术或膀胱病变定位检查,并随访平均(范围)27.3(3 - 65)个月。

结果

在406例膀胱癌患者中,NMP22的总体敏感性为85%,BTAstat为70%,VUC为62%。对于组织学1 - 3级,NMP22检测移行细胞癌的敏感性分别为82%、89%和94%,BTAstat为53%、76%和90%,VUC为38%、68%和90%。尽管所有检测对浸润性癌的敏感性均>85%,但对于浅表肿瘤,NMP22和BTAstat在统计学上比VUC更敏感。使用受试者工作特征曲线计算得出NMP22的最佳阈值为8.25 U/mL。NMP22的特异性为68%,BTAstat为67%,VUC为96%。VUC的特异性保持>87%,且与良性组织学结果无关。相比之下,组织学上无明显泌尿生殖系统疾病的患者中,NMP22和BTAstat的特异性(分别为94%和92%:P = 0.003)显著高于慢性膀胱炎组(两种检测均为52%)。40例活检时无膀胱癌的患者在平均(范围)7.7(3 - 15)个月的随访后复发:所有患者既往均有膀胱癌病史。根据后续复发情况,NMP22的预后阳性和阴性预测值分别为18%和91%,BTAstat为13%和88%,VUC为79%和91%。VUC和NMP22的假阳性检测结果均预测了复发(对数秩检验,P分别<0.001和P = 0.004),但BTAstat检测未显示类似相关性(P = 0.778)。

结论

NMP22和BTAstat检测在检测浅表性和低级别膀胱癌方面优于VUC,但特异性显著较低。排除可能干扰这些检测的疾病后,两种检测的总体特异性均显著提高。膀胱癌随访患者中,NMP22和VUC的假阳性结果与未来复发相关,而BTAstat检测结果无此相关性。

相似文献

1
A comparison of urinary nuclear matrix protein-22 and bladder tumour antigen tests with voided urinary cytology in detecting and following bladder cancer: the prognostic value of false-positive results.尿核基质蛋白-22和膀胱肿瘤抗原检测与尿脱落细胞学检查在膀胱癌检测及随访中的比较:假阳性结果的预后价值
BJU Int. 2001 Nov;88(7):692-701. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.02355.x.
2
Comparative evaluation of the BTAstat test, NMP22, and voided urine cytology in the detection of primary and recurrent bladder tumors.BTAstat检测、NMP22和尿脱落细胞学检查在原发性及复发性膀胱肿瘤检测中的比较评估
Urology. 2000 Jun;55(6):871-5. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00489-1.
3
[Non-invasive urine tests in diagnosis and as prognostic markers for urinary bladder carcinoma. Comparison of the BTAstat and NMP 22 tests with immunocytology using monoclonal antibodies against Lewis X and 486p3/12].[非侵入性尿液检测在膀胱癌诊断及预后标志物中的应用。BTAstat和NMP 22检测与使用抗Lewis X和486p3/12单克隆抗体的免疫细胞学检测的比较]
Urologe A. 2003 Apr;42(4):523-30. doi: 10.1007/s00120-002-0247-6. Epub 2003 Jan 17.
4
A study comparing various noninvasive methods of detecting bladder cancer in urine.一项比较尿液中膀胱癌多种非侵入性检测方法的研究。
BJU Int. 2002 Mar;89(4):369-73. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.01699.x.
5
[Clinical evaluation of BTAstat, NMP22, HA, survivin, CD44v6, vEGF and VUC in bladder cancer diagnosis].[BTAstat、NMP22、透明质酸(HA)、生存素、CD44v6、血管内皮生长因子(vEGF)及尿路上皮癌抗原(VUC)在膀胱癌诊断中的临床评估]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2005 Sep 14;85(35):2507-12.
6
Comparison of the nuclear matrix protein 22 with voided urine cytology and BTA stat test in the diagnosis of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.核基质蛋白22与尿脱落细胞学检查及BTA stat检测在膀胱移行细胞癌诊断中的比较
Eur Urol. 1999 Sep;36(3):225-9. doi: 10.1159/000068002.
7
Comparison of seven screening methods in the diagnosis of bladder cancer.七种筛查方法在膀胱癌诊断中的比较。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2006 Nov 5;119(21):1763-71.
8
Comparative evaluation of the nuclear matrix protein, fibronectin, urinary bladder cancer antigen and voided urine cytology in the detection of bladder tumors.核基质蛋白、纤连蛋白、膀胱癌抗原及晨尿细胞学检查在膀胱肿瘤检测中的比较评估
J Urol. 2002 Aug;168(2):465-9.
9
Use of a new tumor marker, urinary NMP22, in the detection of occult or rapidly recurring transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract following surgical treatment.一种新型肿瘤标志物——尿NMP22在手术治疗后隐匿性或快速复发的泌尿道移行细胞癌检测中的应用。
J Urol. 1996 Aug;156(2 Pt 1):363-7. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199608000-00008.
10
The use of urinary nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) as a diagnostic adjunct to urine cytology for monitoring of recurrent bladder cancer--institutional experience and review.尿核基质蛋白22(NMP22)作为尿液细胞学检查的辅助诊断手段用于监测复发性膀胱癌的机构经验及综述
Diagn Cytopathol. 2015 Apr;43(4):307-14. doi: 10.1002/dc.23239. Epub 2014 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Molecular Markers for Bladder Cancer Screening: An Insight into Bladder Cancer and FDA-Approved Biomarkers.膀胱癌筛查的分子标志物:对膀胱癌和 FDA 批准的生物标志物的深入了解。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Sep 21;24(18):14374. doi: 10.3390/ijms241814374.
2
Diagnostic Performance of Biomarkers for Bladder Cancer Detection Suitable for Community and Primary Care Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.适用于社区和初级保健机构的膀胱癌检测生物标志物的诊断性能:系统评价与荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 24;15(3):709. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030709.
3
Diagnostic performance of nuclear matrix protein 22 and urine cytology for bladder cancer: A meta-analysis.
核基质蛋白 22 联合尿细胞学检查诊断膀胱癌的效能:一项荟萃分析。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2022 Jun;50(6):300-312. doi: 10.1002/dc.24954. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
4
Comparison of Pteridine Normalization Methods in Urine for Detection of Bladder Cancer.尿液中蝶啶标准化方法用于膀胱癌检测的比较
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Aug 20;10(9):612. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10090612.
5
An ensemble approach of urine sediment image analysis and NMP22 test for detection of bladder cancer cells.一种用于检测膀胱癌细胞的尿沉渣图像分析与NMP22检测的综合方法。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2020 Aug;34(8):e23345. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23345. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
6
Urinary metabolites for urological cancer detection: a review on the application of volatile organic compounds for cancers.用于泌尿系统癌症检测的尿液代谢物:挥发性有机化合物在癌症检测中的应用综述
Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2019 Aug 25;7(4):232-248. eCollection 2019.
7
High diagnostic efficacy of 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced fluorescent urine cytology for urothelial carcinoma.5-氨基酮戊酸诱导荧光尿细胞学诊断尿路上皮癌的高诊断效能。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2019 Sep;24(9):1075-1080. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01447-5. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
8
Urinary Biomarkers in the Evaluation of Primary Hematuria: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.原发性血尿评估中的尿液生物标志物:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Bladder Cancer. 2018 Oct 29;4(4):353-363. doi: 10.3233/BLC-180179.
9
Current Use and Promise of Urinary Markers for Urothelial Cancer.尿路上皮癌尿液标志物的当前应用与前景
Curr Urol Rep. 2018 Oct 17;19(12):96. doi: 10.1007/s11934-018-0857-1.
10
A Systematic Review of the Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Urinary Protein Biomarkers in Urothelial Bladder Cancer.尿蛋白生物标志物在上尿路上皮癌诊断和预后价值的系统评价
Bladder Cancer. 2016 Jul 27;2(3):301-317. doi: 10.3233/BLC-160054.