Suppr超能文献

手法治疗安慰剂对照试验的规划问题:一项初步研究的结果

Issues in planning a placebo-controlled trial of manual methods: results of a pilot study.

作者信息

Hawk Cheryl, Long Cynthia R, Reiter Robert, Davis Charles S, Cambron Jerrilyn A, Evans Roni

机构信息

Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Davenport, IA 52803, USA.

出版信息

J Altern Complement Med. 2002 Feb;8(1):21-32. doi: 10.1089/107555302753507159.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

There are fundamental differences between the administration of medications and the application of manual procedures, such as those used by chiropractors. The objective of this study was to gather preliminary information on how to address these differences in the design of a multisite, randomized placebo-controlled trial of chiropractic care for women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP).

DESIGN

Pilot study for a multisite, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

SETTING

Three chiropractic research clinics in the midwest United States.

SUBJECTS

Thirty-nine (39) women with CPP of at least 6 months' duration, diagnosed by board-certified gynecologists.

INTERVENTIONS

The active intervention consisted of the chiropractic technique, lumbar spine flexion-distraction, combined with manual Trigger Point Therapy. The placebo intervention consisted of a sham chiropractic procedure performed with an instrument combined with effleurage (light massage).

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was the change in the Pain Disability Index (PDI) from baseline to the end of treatment (6 weeks), assessed by group and site. If the change score was in the same direction at all sites, the results were to be combined to estimate treatment effect size.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics were similar to those of patients with CPP in other studies. Recruitment methods, particularly in respect to the eligibility criteria and screening protocols, would require modification in order to recruit an adequate sample for the planned randomized controlled trial. Clinicians followed standardized procedures with apparently minimal deviation, patients in both groups were satisfied with their care and blinding appeared to be successful. PDI change scores were not consistent across sites and so results were not combined and overall treatment effect sizes were not estimated.

CONCLUSIONS

The technical and personnel resources required to achieve adequate standardization of procedures at multiple sites may make a placebo-controlled trial unfeasible, given our current lack of knowledge about the active agent in manual chiropractic procedures.

摘要

目的

药物管理与手动操作程序(如脊椎按摩师所使用的那些程序)的应用之间存在根本差异。本研究的目的是收集初步信息,以了解如何在针对慢性盆腔疼痛(CPP)女性的多中心、随机安慰剂对照脊椎按摩治疗试验设计中解决这些差异。

设计

多中心、随机、安慰剂对照临床试验的试点研究。

地点

美国中西部的三家脊椎按摩研究诊所。

受试者

39名经委员会认证的妇科医生诊断为患有至少6个月持续性CPP的女性。

干预措施

积极干预包括脊椎按摩技术、腰椎屈伸牵引,结合手动触发点疗法。安慰剂干预包括使用器械进行的假脊椎按摩程序并结合轻抚法(轻按摩)。

结果测量

主要结果测量指标是从基线到治疗结束(6周)疼痛残疾指数(PDI)的变化,按组和地点进行评估。如果所有地点的变化分数方向相同,则将结果合并以估计治疗效果大小。

结果

患者特征与其他研究中CPP患者的特征相似。招募方法,特别是在资格标准和筛查方案方面,需要修改,以便为计划中的随机对照试验招募足够的样本。临床医生遵循标准化程序,偏差明显最小,两组患者对其护理都很满意,并且盲法似乎很成功。各地点的PDI变化分数不一致,因此未合并结果,也未估计总体治疗效果大小。

结论

鉴于我们目前对手动脊椎按摩程序中的活性剂缺乏了解,在多个地点实现程序充分标准化所需的技术和人员资源可能使安慰剂对照试验不可行。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验