Kaune W T, Dovan T, Kavet R I, Savitz D A, Neutra R R
Richland, Washington, USA.
Bioelectromagnetics. 2002 Apr;23(3):177-88. doi: 10.1002/bem.10001.
An epidemiological study conducted by Savitz et al. reported that residential wire codes were more strongly associated with childhood cancer than were measured magnetic fields, a peculiar result because wire codes were originally developed to be a surrogate for residential magnetic fields. The primary purpose of the study reported here, known as the Back to Denver (BTD) study, was to obtain data to help in the interpretation of the original results of Savitz et al. The BTD study included 81 homes that had been occupied by case and control subjects of Savitz et al., stratified by wire code as follows: 18 high current configuration (HCC) case homes; 20 HCC control homes; 20 low current configuration (LCC) case homes; and 23 LCC control homes. Analysis of new data acquired in these homes led to the following previously unpublished conclusions. The home-averaged (i.e., mean of fields measured in subjects' bedrooms, family/living rooms, and rooms where meals normally eaten) spot 60 Hz, 180 Hz, and harmonic (i.e., 60-420 Hz) magnetic fields were associated with wire codes. The 180 Hz and harmonic components, but not the 60 Hz component, were associated with case/control status. Measured static magnetic fields were only weakly correlated (rapproximately 0.2) between rooms in homes. The BTD data provide little support for, but are too sparse to definitively test, the 1995 resonance hypothesis proposed by Bowman et al. Case and control homes had similar concentrations of copper in their tap water. Copper concentration was not associated with wire codes nor with the level of electric current carried by a home's water pipe. These results of the BTD study suggest that future case/control studies investigating power frequency magnetic fields might wish to include measurements of 180 Hz or harmonic magnetic fields in order to examine their associations (if any) with disease status.
萨维茨等人进行的一项流行病学研究报告称,住宅电线编码与儿童癌症的关联比测量到的磁场更强,这是一个奇特的结果,因为电线编码最初是作为住宅磁场的替代指标而制定的。此处报告的这项研究,即“回到丹佛”(BTD)研究,其主要目的是获取数据,以帮助解释萨维茨等人的原始研究结果。BTD研究包括81所曾被萨维茨等人研究中的病例和对照受试者居住过的房屋,根据电线编码分层如下:18所高电流配置(HCC)病例房屋;20所HCC对照房屋;20所低电流配置(LCC)病例房屋;以及23所LCC对照房屋。对这些房屋中获取的新数据进行分析得出了以下之前未发表的结论。家庭平均(即受试者卧室、家庭/客厅以及通常用餐房间中测量到的磁场平均值)的60赫兹、180赫兹以及谐波(即60 - 420赫兹)磁场与电线编码有关。180赫兹和谐波分量与病例/对照状态有关,但60赫兹分量无关。测量到的静磁场在房屋各房间之间的相关性较弱(约为0.2)。BTD数据几乎无法支持但又因过于稀疏而无法确切检验鲍曼等人在1995年提出的共振假说。病例房屋和对照房屋的自来水中铜浓度相似。铜浓度与电线编码以及家庭水管所承载的电流水平均无关。BTD研究的这些结果表明,未来调查工频磁场的病例/对照研究可能希望纳入180赫兹或谐波磁场的测量,以便检验它们与疾病状态的关联(如果有的话)。