von der Maase Hans
Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Semin Oncol. 2002 Feb;29(1 Suppl 3):3-14. doi: 10.1053/sonc.2002.30750.
The methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin (MVAC) regimen has been the standard treatment in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer for the past 15 years. The minimal or moderate survival benefit-depending on prognostic features-and the severe toxicity associated with the MVAC regimen have made the search for new drugs and drug combinations of utmost importance to increase efficacy and/or decrease toxicity. In this respect, the taxanes and gemcitabine are promising new drugs. Paclitaxel and docetaxel as single agents have yielded overall response rates of 7% to 56%, depending on whether the patients have received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin has been explored in three studies with a total of 104 evaluable patients, a pooled overall response (OR) rate of 61%, and a complete response (CR) rate of 20%. There are two studies of docetaxel and cisplatin with a total of 91 evaluable patients, an OR rate of 54%, and a CR rate of 16%. The OR rate for paclitaxel and carboplatin in six studies was 43%, with a CR rate of 13%; however, the reported median survival was only 8.5 to 9.5 months. The OR rate for single-agent gemcitabine based on five studies was 26%, with a CR rate of 9%, which was apparently independent of whether the patients had received prior chemotherapy. The OR rate for gemcitabine and cisplatin in four phase II studies ranged from 41% to 57%, with a CR rate of 15% to 22% and a median survival of 12.5 to 14.3 months. Based on the encouraging results for the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC), a randomized phase III trial comparing GC and MVAC was begun in late 1996. This study of 405 randomized patients showed that the two regimens were associated with similar response rates, time to progression, and overall survival, whereas GC was associated with less toxicity than MVAC. On the basis of this superior risk-benefit ratio, the GC regimen should be favored as a new standard treatment in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer. Other promising combinations include gemcitabine and paclitaxel, with or without cisplatin, and the combination of ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and cisplatin. The triple combination of gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and cisplatin has yielded an OR rate of 78%, a CR rate of 28%, and a median survival of 24 months. An international phase III trial comparing this triple combination with GC in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer has now been initiated.
在过去15年里,甲氨蝶呤/长春碱/阿霉素/顺铂(MVAC)方案一直是局部晚期和转移性尿路上皮癌患者的标准治疗方案。MVAC方案带来的生存获益极小或适中(取决于预后特征),且伴有严重毒性,因此寻找新药物及药物组合以提高疗效和/或降低毒性至关重要。在这方面,紫杉烷类和吉西他滨是很有前景的新药。紫杉醇和多西他赛单药治疗的总体缓解率为7%至56%,这取决于患者是否曾接受过转移性疾病的一线化疗。三项研究共纳入104例可评估患者,探讨了紫杉醇与顺铂的联合应用,汇总后的总体缓解(OR)率为61%,完全缓解(CR)率为20%。两项研究共纳入91例可评估患者,探讨了多西他赛与顺铂的联合应用,OR率为54%,CR率为16%。六项研究中,紫杉醇与卡铂联合应用的OR率为43%,CR率为13%;然而,报告的中位生存期仅为8.5至9.5个月。五项研究中,吉西他滨单药治疗的OR率为26%,CR率为9%,这显然与患者是否接受过一线化疗无关。四项II期研究中,吉西他滨与顺铂联合应用的OR率为41%至57%,CR率为15%至22%,中位生存期为12.5至14.3个月。基于吉西他滨与顺铂(GC)联合应用的令人鼓舞的结果,1996年末启动了一项比较GC与MVAC的随机III期试验。这项针对405例随机患者的研究表明,两种方案的缓解率、疾病进展时间和总生存期相似,而GC方案的毒性低于MVAC方案。基于这种更好的风险效益比,GC方案应作为局部晚期和转移性尿路上皮癌患者的新标准治疗方案受到青睐。其他有前景的联合方案包括吉西他滨与紫杉醇联合应用(含或不含顺铂),以及异环磷酰胺、紫杉醇和顺铂联合应用。吉西他滨、紫杉醇和顺铂三联方案的OR率为78%,CR率为28%,中位生存期为24个月。目前已启动一项国际III期试验,比较该三联方案与GC方案在局部晚期和转移性尿路上皮癌患者中的疗效。