von der Maase Hans, Sengelov Lisa, Roberts James T, Ricci Sergio, Dogliotti Luigi, Oliver T, Moore Malcolm J, Zimmermann Annamaria, Arning Michael
Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jul 20;23(21):4602-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.757.
To compare long-term survival in patients with locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium treated with gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) or methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin (MVAC).
Efficacy data from a large randomized phase III study of GC versus MVAC were updated. Time-to-event analyses were performed on the observed distributions of overall and progression-free survival.
A total of 405 patients were randomly assigned: 203 to the GC arm and 202 to the MVAC arm. At the time of analysis, 347 patients had died (GC arm, 176 patients; MVAC arm, 171 patients). Overall survival was similar in both arms (hazard ratio [HR], 1.09; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.34; P = .66) with a median survival of 14.0 months for GC and 15.2 months for MVAC. The 5-year overall survival rates were 13.0% and 15.3%, respectively (P = .53). The median progression-free survival was 7.7 months for GC and 8.3 months for MVAC, with an HR of 1.09. The 5-year progression-free survival rates were 9.8% and 11.3%, respectively (P = .63). Significant prognostic factors favoring overall survival included performance score (> 70), TNM staging (M0 v M1), low/normal alkaline phosphatase level, number of disease sites (<or= three), and the absence of visceral metastases. By adjusting for these prognostic factors, the HR was 0.99 for overall survival and 1.01 for progression-free survival. The 5-year overall survival rates for patients with and without visceral metastases were 6.8% and 20.9%, respectively.
Long-term overall and progression-free survival after treatment with GC or MVAC are similar. These results strengthen the role of GC as a standard of care in patients with locally advanced or metastatic TCC.
比较吉西他滨/顺铂(GC)或甲氨蝶呤/长春碱/阿霉素/顺铂(MVAC)治疗局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮移行细胞癌(TCC)患者的长期生存率。
更新了一项关于GC与MVAC的大型随机III期研究的疗效数据。对观察到的总生存期和无进展生存期分布进行了事件发生时间分析。
共405例患者被随机分组:203例进入GC组,202例进入MVAC组。在分析时,347例患者死亡(GC组176例;MVAC组171例)。两组的总生存期相似(风险比[HR]为1.09;95%可信区间为0.88至1.34;P = 0.66),GC组的中位生存期为14.0个月,MVAC组为15.2个月。5年总生存率分别为13.0%和15.3%(P = 0.53)。GC组的中位无进展生存期为7.7个月,MVAC组为8.3个月,HR为1.09。5年无进展生存率分别为9.8%和11.3%(P = 0.63)。有利于总生存期的显著预后因素包括体能状态评分(>70)、TNM分期(M0对M1)、碱性磷酸酶水平低/正常、疾病部位数量(≤3个)以及无内脏转移。通过对这些预后因素进行校正,总生存期的HR为0.99,无进展生存期的HR为1.01。有内脏转移和无内脏转移患者的5年总生存率分别为6.8%和20.9%。
GC或MVAC治疗后的长期总生存期和无进展生存期相似。这些结果强化了GC作为局部晚期或转移性TCC患者护理标准的作用。