• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Dissociating prelexical and postlexical processing of affective information in the two hemispheres: effects of the stimulus presentation format.

作者信息

Windmann Sabine, Daum Irene, Güntürkün Onur

机构信息

Department of Biopsychology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

Brain Lang. 2002 Mar;80(3):269-86. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2586.

DOI:10.1006/brln.2001.2586
PMID:11896641
Abstract

Using a lexical decision task, the authors investigated whether brain asymmetries in the detection of emotionally negative semantic associations arise only at a perceptually discriminative stage at which lexical analysis is accurate or can already be found at crude and incomplete levels of perceptual representation at which word-nonword discrimination is based solely on guessing. Emotionally negative and neutral items were presented near perceptual threshold in the left and right visual hemifields. Word-nonword discrimination performance as well as the bias to classify a stimulus as a "word" (whether or not it actually is a word) were assessed for a normal, horizontal stimulus presentation format (Experiment 1) and for an unusual, vertical presentation format (Experiment 2). Results show that while the two hemispheres are equally able to detect affective semantic associations at a prelexical processing stage (both experiments), the right hemisphere is superior at a postlexical, perceptually discriminative stage (Experiment 2). Moreover, the findings suggest that only an unusual, nonoverlearned stimulus presentation format allows adequate assessment of the right hemisphere's lexical-semantic skills.

摘要

相似文献

1
Dissociating prelexical and postlexical processing of affective information in the two hemispheres: effects of the stimulus presentation format.
Brain Lang. 2002 Mar;80(3):269-86. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2586.
2
The effect of word length on hemispheric word recognition: evidence from unilateral and bilateral-redundant presentations.词长对半球词识别的影响:来自单侧和双侧冗余呈现的证据。
Brain Cogn. 2002 Mar-Apr;48(2-3):447-52.
3
Orthographic neighborhood effects in the right but not in the left cerebral hemisphere.正字法邻域效应出现在右侧而非左侧大脑半球。
Brain Lang. 2002 Jan;80(1):63-76. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2570.
4
Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.重新评估单词识别中的中央凹分裂加工:单词长度的影响。
Cortex. 2009 Apr;45(4):495-505. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.07.007. Epub 2008 Feb 11.
5
Hemisphere-specific effects in word recognition do not require hemisphere-specific modes of access.
Brain Lang. 2004 Mar;88(3):279-93. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00160-3.
6
Length, formats, neighbours, hemispheres, and the processing of words presented laterally or at fixation.长度、格式、相邻关系、半球,以及向一侧呈现或在注视点呈现的单词的处理。
Brain Lang. 2004 Mar;88(3):355-66. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00166-4.
7
Lexical competition is enhanced in the left hemisphere: evidence from different types of orthographic neighbors.词汇竞争在左半球得到增强:来自不同类型正字法邻接词的证据。
Brain Lang. 2008 Jun;105(3):199-210. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.08.005. Epub 2007 Oct 1.
8
Word length and orthographic neighborhood size effects in the left and right cerebral hemispheres.左右大脑半球的词长和正字法邻域大小效应
Brain Lang. 2002 Jan;80(1):45-62. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2583.
9
Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of retinal eccentricity on hemispheric dominance.重新评估单词识别中的中央凹分裂加工:视网膜离心率对半球优势的影响。
Neuropsychology. 2008 Nov;22(6):738-45. doi: 10.1037/a0013140.
10
Evaluating a split fovea model of visual word recognition: effects of case alternation in the two visual fields and in the left and right halves of words presented at the fovea.评估视觉单词识别的分裂中央凹模型:两个视野以及中央凹呈现单词的左右半部分中大小写交替的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(8):1128-37. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.11.022. Epub 2005 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of the left medial prefrontal cortex and posterior cingulate cortex in processing positive emotional words: evidence from a meta-analysis and an empirical study.左内侧前额叶皮质和后扣带回皮质在处理积极情绪词汇中的作用:来自一项元分析和实证研究的证据。
Brain Struct Funct. 2025 Jun 10;230(6):95. doi: 10.1007/s00429-025-02955-z.
2
The Relationship Between Personality Traits and the Processing of Emotion Words: Evidence from Eye-Movements in Sentence Reading.人格特质与情绪词汇加工的关系:来自句子阅读中眼动的证据。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2023 Oct;52(5):1497-1523. doi: 10.1007/s10936-023-09959-y. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
3
The impact of emotional content on pseudoword recognition.
情绪内容对假词识别的影响。
Psychol Res. 2021 Nov;85(8):2980-2996. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01454-6. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
4
Individual differences in emotion word processing: A diffusion model analysis.情绪词加工的个体差异:一种扩散模型分析。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016 Jun;16(3):489-501. doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0408-5.
5
Emotion word processing: does mood make a difference?情绪词汇处理:情绪会产生影响吗?
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 24;6:1191. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01191. eCollection 2015.
6
Seeing emotions in the eyes - inverse priming effects induced by eyes expressing mental states.从眼神中看出情绪——由表达心理状态的眼睛引发的反向启动效应。
Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 17;5:1039. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01039. eCollection 2014.
7
Caffeine improves left hemisphere processing of positive words.咖啡因可改善左半球对积极词汇的处理。
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48487. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048487. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
8
Discrete emotion effects on lexical decision response times.离散情绪对词汇判断反应时的影响。
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023743. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
9
Processing the emotions in words: the complementary contributions of the left and right hemispheres.用言语处理情绪:左右半球的互补贡献。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2011 Sep;11(3):372-85. doi: 10.3758/s13415-011-0034-1.
10
The influence of emotional associations on the neural correlates of semantic priming.情绪联想对语义启动的神经相关因素的影响。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 Mar;33(3):676-94. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21241. Epub 2011 Apr 21.