Coleman Katie, Murray Elizabeth
City Road Medical Centre, 190 City Road, London EC1V 2QH, UK.
Fam Pract. 2002 Apr;19(2):183-8. doi: 10.1093/fampra/19.2.183.
The 1993 directive Tomorrow's Doctors recommended an increase in community-based teaching. In response, many new programmes have been established focusing on the teaching of clinical skills to pairs or groups of students in general practice, when patients are asked to see the students in the practice or in their homes, specifically to assist with teaching. This differs from the traditional model of teaching primary care, when one student sits with the doctor while s/he consults. Although current research suggests that patients are happy for one student to be present during a consultation with their GP, little or nothing is known about their views of this new method of teaching basic clinical skills in the community. If the new community-based teaching programmes are to be sustainable, continuing support from the patients is necessary. Students have been taught clinical skills in the community at University College London Medical School for several years. Research has demonstrated its effectiveness and its popularity with students. However, to date, patients' views have not been explored.
Our aim was to determine the patients' views and feelings on community-based teaching, in order to discover both the positive and negative aspects for participating patients.
A qualitative semi-structured interview study was carried out in undergraduate teaching general practices in North London.
Respondents felt very positive about participating in the community-based teaching programme. There were two underlying components to this: altruism and personal gain. Within altruism, reasons included: provision of a service to the community and repaying the system. Aspects of personal gain included: improved knowledge, improved self-esteem and companionship. Patient concerns included: embarrassment, reinforcement of the sick role and concerns about student access to notes.
Patients enjoy their involvement in community-based teaching and perceive themselves as making a valuable contribution. The findings of the research will be reassuring for doctors who presently are involved and those who plan to be involved in the future. Doctors need to be aware of the possible shifts in the doctor-patient relationship when actively seeking patients' help in the teaching.
1993年的指令《明日之医》建议增加基于社区的教学。作为回应,许多新的项目已经建立起来,这些项目专注于在全科医疗中向成对或成组的学生教授临床技能,即要求患者在诊所或家中接待学生,专门用于辅助教学。这与传统的初级保健教学模式不同,传统模式是一名学生在医生诊疗时坐在一旁。尽管目前的研究表明患者对于一名学生在与全科医生会诊时在场感到满意,但对于他们对这种在社区教授基本临床技能的新方法的看法却知之甚少。如果新的基于社区的教学项目要持续下去,患者的持续支持是必要的。伦敦大学学院医学院已经在社区向学生教授临床技能数年。研究已经证明了其有效性以及在学生中的受欢迎程度。然而,迄今为止,尚未探究患者的看法。
我们的目的是确定患者对基于社区的教学的看法和感受,以便发现参与其中的患者的积极和消极方面。
在伦敦北部的本科教学全科诊所开展了一项定性半结构式访谈研究。
受访者对参与基于社区的教学项目感到非常积极。这有两个潜在因素:利他主义和个人收获。在利他主义方面,原因包括:为社区提供服务和回报医疗体系。个人收获的方面包括:知识增加、自尊提高和获得陪伴。患者的担忧包括:尴尬、强化患者角色以及对学生获取病历的担忧。
患者乐于参与基于社区的教学,并认为自己做出了有价值的贡献。该研究结果将让目前参与以及未来计划参与的医生感到安心。医生在教学中积极寻求患者帮助时需要意识到医患关系可能发生的变化。