Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.
Med Educ. 2012 Oct;46(10):963-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04332.x.
It is important to know how patients are affected by becoming opportunistically involved in medical student education. In previous studies, researchers rather than patients set the research agenda and expert patients or people well known to teachers were more often involved than ordinary people.
This study aimed to explore how ordinary patients experience undergraduate medical teaching when they become involved in it opportunistically and to derive practical insights from the lived experiences of these patients.
The research was conducted in line with a conceptual orientation towards communities of practice theory and used phenomenology as a way of exploring patients' lived experiences in depth. Minimally structured interviews were carried out with 10 patients following ordinary out-patient or general practice appointments in which students were being taught. Template analysis was used to generate provisional themes and a process of phenomenological reduction was used to distil individual respondents' lived experiences to their essence.
The presence of students in ambulatory consultations was normal. Nine respondents described transactional relationships in which they remained outside the community of practice of which the doctor and student were members. Only an intimate problem would engage them deeply enough for a student's presence to 'bother' them. One patient's personal and professional background led her to regard doctors' handling of consultation dynamics as factors contributing to whether teaching consultations were negative or positive experiences. When doctors' sensitive and inclusive behaviour drew her into a triadic relationship with the student and doctor, she experienced mutual benefits with students. When it did not, she felt objectified and alienated.
Provided they receive the clinical care for which they are attending a consultation and are treated respectfully, patients may sometimes willingly become 'objects' from which students learn. They may, however, become more deeply engaged in teaching consultations in which they participate actively in a triadic relationship of mutual benefit with a doctor and student. Teaching consultations call for doctors to be sensitive and adaptable.
了解患者在偶然参与医学生教育时的感受非常重要。在以前的研究中,研究人员而非患者设定了研究议程,而且参与研究的往往是专家患者或教师熟知的人,而不是普通患者。
本研究旨在探讨当普通患者偶然参与其中时,他们对本科医学教学的体验,并从这些患者的实际体验中得出实际的见解。
该研究符合实践社区理论的概念取向,并采用现象学作为深入探索患者生活体验的方法。在门诊或普通诊所就诊期间有学生在场的情况下,对 10 名患者进行了最小结构访谈,学生正在接受教学。使用模板分析生成临时主题,并使用现象学还原过程将每位受访者的生活体验提炼为其本质。
学生在门诊咨询中的存在是正常的。9 位受访者描述了交易关系,他们仍然处于医生和学生所在的实践社区之外。只有一个亲密的问题会让他们深入参与,以至于学生的存在会“打扰”他们。一位患者的个人和专业背景使她认为医生处理咨询动态是教学咨询体验是负面还是正面的因素之一。当医生的敏感和包容的行为将她吸引到与学生和医生的三方关系中时,她与学生共同受益。当没有这种情况时,她感到被客观化和疏远。
只要他们在就诊时得到所需的临床护理并受到尊重,患者有时可能会自愿成为学生学习的“对象”。然而,他们可能会更深入地参与教学咨询,在这种咨询中,他们与医生和学生积极参与三方互惠关系。教学咨询需要医生具有敏感性和适应性。