O'Day Steven J, Kim Christina J, Reintgen Douglas S
John Wayne Cancer Institute at St. John's Health Center, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA.
Cancer Control. 2002 Jan-Feb;9(1):31-8. doi: 10.1177/107327480200900105.
Single-agent or combination chemotherapy regimens have not impacted the short median survival of patients with metastatic melanoma, and complete or durable responses are rare. Biologic response modifiers (interferon and interleukin-2) have produced durable remissions in a small cohort of patients, and phase II trials of biochemotherapy suggest more benefit.
The authors retrospectively reviewed the status of the current treatments of metastatic melanoma focusing on biochemotherapy.
Regimens include both sequential and concurrent approaches for inpatient and outpatient treatment settings. Overall response rates in phase II trials are 40% to 60% with complete responses of 10% to 20% and median survivals in the 11- to 12-month range. Modifications of concurrent biochemotherapy regimens have maintained efficacy and reduced toxicity. Small phase III trials suggest a survival advantage of biochemotherapy (P=.05).
Biochemotherapy remains a promising new treatment for metastatic melanoma. A large Intergroup trial E3695 comparing concurrent biochemotherapy to combination chemotherapy alone is powered to answer important survival questions.
单药或联合化疗方案并未影响转移性黑色素瘤患者较短的中位生存期,且完全缓解或持久缓解很少见。生物反应调节剂(干扰素和白细胞介素-2)在一小部分患者中产生了持久缓解,生物化疗的II期试验显示出更多益处。
作者回顾性分析了转移性黑色素瘤当前治疗的现状,重点关注生物化疗。
方案包括住院和门诊治疗环境下的序贯和同步方法。II期试验的总体缓解率为40%至60%,完全缓解率为10%至20%,中位生存期在11至12个月范围内。同步生物化疗方案的调整维持了疗效并降低了毒性。小型III期试验表明生物化疗具有生存优势(P = 0.05)。
生物化疗仍然是转移性黑色素瘤一种有前景的新治疗方法。一项将同步生物化疗与单纯联合化疗进行比较的大型多中心试验E3695,旨在回答重要的生存问题。