Fava Maurizio, Hoog Sharon L, Judge Rajinder A, Kopp Joan B, Nilsson Mary E, Gonzales Jill S
Depression Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2002 Apr;22(2):137-47. doi: 10.1097/00004714-200204000-00006.
This study assessed whether fluoxetine, sertraline, and paroxetine differ in efficacy and tolerability in depressed patients and the impact of baseline insomnia on outcomes. Patients (N = 284) with DSM-IV major depressive disorder were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion to fluoxetine, paroxetine, or sertraline for 10 to 16 weeks of treatment. Using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) sleep disturbance factor score, patients were categorized into low (<4) or high (>or=4) baseline insomnia subgroups. Changes in depression and insomnia were assessed. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), reasons for discontinuation, and AEs leading to discontinuation. In addition, AEs were evaluated within insomnia subgroups to determine emergence of activation or sedation. Depression improvement, assessed with the HAM-D-17 total score, was similar among treatments in all patients (p = 0.365) and the high (p = 0.853) and low insomnia (p = 0.415) subgroups. Insomnia improvement, assessed with the HAM-D sleep disturbance factor score, was similar among treatments in all patients (p = 0.868) and in the high (p = 0.852) and low insomnia (p = 0.982) subgroups. Analyses revealed no significant differences between treatments in the percentages of patients with substantial worsening, any worsening, worsening at endpoint, or improvement at endpoint in the HAM-D sleep disturbance factor in either insomnia subgroup. Treatments were well tolerated in most patients. No significant differences between treatments in the incidence of AEs suggestive of activation or sedation were seen in the insomnia subgroups. These data show no significant differences in acute treatment efficacy and tolerability across fluoxetine, sertraline, and paroxetine in major depressive disorder patients. Improvement in overall depression and in associated insomnia was achieved by most patients regardless of baseline insomnia.
本研究评估了氟西汀、舍曲林和帕罗西汀在抑郁症患者中的疗效和耐受性差异,以及基线失眠对治疗结果的影响。284例符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)中重度抑郁症诊断标准的患者,以双盲方式随机分配接受氟西汀、帕罗西汀或舍曲林治疗10至16周。使用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)的睡眠障碍因子评分,将患者分为低(<4)或高(≥4)基线失眠亚组。评估抑郁和失眠的变化。安全性评估包括治疗中出现的不良事件(AE)、停药原因以及导致停药的AE。此外,在失眠亚组中评估AE,以确定是否出现激越或镇静。用HAM-D-17总分评估,所有患者(p = 0.365)、高失眠亚组(p = 0.853)和低失眠亚组(p = 0.415)中,各治疗组的抑郁改善情况相似。用HAM-D睡眠障碍因子评分评估,所有患者(p = 0.868)、高失眠亚组(p = 0.852)和低失眠亚组(p = 0.982)中,各治疗组的失眠改善情况相似。分析显示,在两个失眠亚组中,各治疗组在HAM-D睡眠障碍因子方面,出现明显恶化、任何恶化、终点时恶化或终点时改善的患者百分比无显著差异。大多数患者对治疗耐受性良好。在失眠亚组中,各治疗组在提示激越或镇静的AE发生率方面无显著差异。这些数据表明,在重度抑郁症患者中,氟西汀、舍曲林和帕罗西汀在急性治疗疗效和耐受性方面无显著差异。大多数患者无论基线失眠情况如何,总体抑郁及相关失眠均得到改善。