Potkin Steven G, Thyrum Per T, Alva Gustavo, Carreon Danilo, Yeh Chiao, Kalali Amir, Arvanitis Lisa A
Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Medical Center, Orange, USA.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2002 Apr;22(2):174-82. doi: 10.1097/00004714-200204000-00011.
The effects of fluoxetine and imipramine on the pharmacokinetics and nonpsychiatric side effect profile of quetiapine fumarate were investigated in 26 patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar disorder in a multicenter, two-period, multiple-dose, open-label, randomized trial. Over a 1- to 2-week period, patients were titrated to a 300-mg twice-daily dose of quetiapine. Patients treated for at least 7 days at the target dose entered a combination therapy period, receiving fluoxetine (60 mg daily) or imipramine (75 mg twice daily) for 8 days. Key assessments included pharmacokinetic analysis of quetiapine, the Udvalg for kliniske undersøgelser (UKU) Side Effect Rating Scale, and safety evaluations (e.g., adverse events, electrocardiograms, laboratory tests, and vital signs). Fluoxetine increased the quetiapine area under the plasma concentration time curve during a 12-hour interval (+12%), maximum plasma concentration during the dosing interval (C(ss)(max); +26%), and minimum plasma concentration at the end of the dosing interval (+8%), although it decreased oral clearance (-11%). The change in C(ss)(max) was statistically although not clinically significant. Imipramine did not affect the pharmacokinetics of quetiapine. Overall, scores on the UKU Side Effect Rating Scale improved during combination therapy with either agent, and no statistically significant deterioration was observed for any item. For safety assessments, the only clinically remarkable event was an imipramine-associated complete left bundle branch block in one patient. No unexpected side effects were reported. In conclusion, combination therapy with quetiapine and fluoxetine or imipramine had a minimal effect on quetiapine pharmacokinetics and was well tolerated.
在一项多中心、两阶段、多剂量、开放标签、随机试验中,对26例精神分裂症、分裂情感性障碍或双相情感障碍患者研究了氟西汀和丙咪嗪对富马酸喹硫平药代动力学及非精神科副作用情况的影响。在1至2周的时间里,患者被滴定至每日两次、每次300毫克的喹硫平剂量。在目标剂量下接受至少7天治疗的患者进入联合治疗阶段,接受氟西汀(每日60毫克)或丙咪嗪(每日两次、每次75毫克)治疗8天。主要评估包括喹硫平的药代动力学分析、临床研究评定量表(UKU)副作用评定量表以及安全性评估(如不良事件、心电图、实验室检查和生命体征)。氟西汀使喹硫平在12小时间隔内的血浆浓度时间曲线下面积增加(+12%),给药间隔期间的最大血浆浓度(C(ss)(max);+26%)以及给药间隔结束时的最小血浆浓度增加(+8%),尽管它降低了口服清除率(-11%)。C(ss)(max)的变化具有统计学意义,尽管在临床上并不显著。丙咪嗪未影响喹硫平的药代动力学。总体而言,在与任一药物联合治疗期间,UKU副作用评定量表的得分均有所改善,且未观察到任何项目有统计学意义的恶化。对于安全性评估,唯一临床上值得注意的事件是1例患者出现与丙咪嗪相关的完全性左束支传导阻滞。未报告意外副作用。总之,喹硫平与氟西汀或丙咪嗪联合治疗对喹硫平药代动力学影响极小,且耐受性良好。