Figueroa Carlos, Brecher Martin, Hamer-Maansson Jennifer E, Winter Helen
Research Strategy International, Torrance, CA, USA.
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2009 Mar 17;33(2):199-204. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2008.09.026. Epub 2008 Oct 9.
This 10-day, single-center, open-label, randomized, crossover study compared pharmacokinetic profiles and tolerability of extended release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) with quetiapine immediate release (quetiapine IR) in patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or bipolar disorder. After a 2-day lead-in period during which patients received quetiapine XR 300 mg once daily, patients were randomized to quetiapine IR 150 mg twice daily followed by quetiapine XR 300 mg once daily, or quetiapine XR 300 mg once daily followed by quetiapine IR 150 mg twice daily. Pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated at the end of each 4-day treatment period at steady state. Vital signs, laboratory values, and adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout the study. The least squares means (90% confidence interval) of the ratio of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve over a 24 h dosing interval (AUC ([0-24 h])) for quetiapine XR/IR was 1.04 (0.92-1.19) and within the pre-defined range set for equivalence (0.80-1.25). Maximum plasma concentration at steady state (C(max)) was approximately 13% lower for quetiapine XR than for quetiapine IR (495.3 versus 568.1 ng/mL), time to reach C(max) (t(max)) was 5 h versus 2 h and mean concentration at the end of 24 h dosing interval (C(min)) was 95.3 versus 96.5 ng/mL, respectively. No patients withdrew from the study owing to AEs and there were no serious AEs or deaths related to study medication. No unexpected AEs, changes in vital signs or laboratory values were observed. These findings suggest that modifying the formulation does not change the overall absorption or elimination of quetiapine, and support emerging clinical evidence for the use of quetiapine XR as a once daily treatment in patients initiating therapy or those established on quetiapine IR.
这项为期10天的单中心、开放标签、随机交叉研究,比较了富马酸喹硫平缓释片(quetiapine XR)与喹硫平速释片(quetiapine IR)在精神分裂症、分裂情感性障碍或双相情感障碍患者中的药代动力学特征和耐受性。在为期2天的导入期内,患者每日服用一次300mg喹硫平缓释片,之后患者被随机分为两组,一组先每日两次服用150mg喹硫平速释片,随后每日一次服用300mg喹硫平缓释片;另一组先每日一次服用300mg喹硫平缓释片,随后每日两次服用150mg喹硫平速释片。在每个4天治疗期结束时的稳态下评估药代动力学参数。在整个研究过程中记录生命体征、实验室检查值和不良事件(AE)。喹硫平缓释片/速释片在24小时给药间隔内血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC([0 - 24 h]))比值的最小二乘均值(90%置信区间)为1.04(0.92 - 1.19),在预先设定的等效性范围内(0.80 - 1.25)。喹硫平缓释片稳态时的最大血浆浓度(C(max))比喹硫平速释片低约13%(495.3对568.1 ng/mL),达到C(max)的时间(t(max))分别为5小时和2小时,24小时给药间隔结束时的平均浓度(C(min))分别为95.3和96.5 ng/mL。没有患者因不良事件退出研究,也没有与研究药物相关的严重不良事件或死亡。未观察到意外的不良事件、生命体征或实验室检查值的变化。这些发现表明,改变剂型不会改变喹硫平的总体吸收或消除,并支持了越来越多的临床证据,即喹硫平缓释片可作为起始治疗患者或已使用喹硫平速释片患者的每日一次治疗用药。