• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

What is new in cardiovascular health?

作者信息

Douglass Paul

出版信息

Ethn Dis. 2002 Winter;12(1):S2-41-3.

PMID:11913640
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
What is new in cardiovascular health?心血管健康领域有哪些新进展？
Ethn Dis. 2002 Winter;12(1):S2-41-3.
2
Diffuse coronary disease and atherothrombosis: a rationale for long-term therapy to prevent recurrent ischemic events.
J Invasive Cardiol. 2003 Mar;15 Suppl B:3B-9B; discussion 9B-10B.
3
[Coronary aneurysm of the ramus interventricularis anterior and right coronary artery and significant stenosis in both vessels (coronary two-vessel disease].
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2007 Jun 15;132(24):1325-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-982032.
4
Percutaneous coronary intervention for left main coronary artery disease.
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2007 Mar;5(2):213-20. doi: 10.1586/14779072.5.2.213.
5
A meta-analysis of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for isolated left anterior descending artery disease is indispensable.对微创冠状动脉搭桥术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗支架置入术治疗孤立性左前降支病变进行荟萃分析是必不可少的。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Aug;134(2):548; author reply 548-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.03.047.
6
Management and outcome of patients with established coronary artery disease: the Euro Heart Survey on coronary revascularization.已确诊冠心病患者的管理与预后：欧洲冠状动脉血运重建调查
Eur Heart J. 2005 Jun;26(12):1169-79. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi238. Epub 2005 Mar 31.
7
Does off-pump or minimally invasive coronary artery bypass reduce mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization when compared with percutaneous coronary intervention? A meta-analysis of randomized trials.与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗相比，非体外循环或微创冠状动脉搭桥术是否能降低死亡率、发病率和资源利用？一项随机试验的荟萃分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Mar;133(3):623-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.11.019.
8
Keeping the patient in view: defining the appropriateness of percutaneous coronary interventions.关注患者：界定经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的适宜性
Circulation. 2004 Dec 21;110(25):3746-8. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000150389.35936.4D.
9
Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary artery intervention in patients on chronic hemodialysis: does a drug-eluting stent have an impact on clinical outcome?慢性血液透析患者的冠状动脉搭桥手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗：药物洗脱支架对临床结局有影响吗？
J Card Surg. 2009 May-Jun;24(3):234-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2008.00789.x.
10
Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention with medication in the treatment of coronary artery disease in hemodialysis patients.血液透析患者冠状动脉疾病治疗中经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与药物治疗的比较。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Aug;17(8):2322-32. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005090958. Epub 2006 Jul 12.