Janssen J A M J L, Lamberts S W J
Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur J Endocrinol. 2002 Apr;146(4):467-77. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1460467.
The incidence of peripheral, cerebro- and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is approximately twice as high as in the non-diabetic population. Conventional cardiovascular risk factors such as plasma lipids, lipoproteins and hypertension only partially explain this excessive risk of developing atherosclerosis and CVD. Meta-analysis of studies performed in non-diabetic populations indicates that the risk of CVD increases continuously with glucose levels above 4.2 mmol/l. The glucose hypothesis suggests that treatment which normalizes glucose levels prevents or delays the long-term complications of diabetes mellitus. However, the outcome of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study demonstrates that glucose control does not completely prevent CVD.In healthy subjects, serum IGF-I levels peak in early adulthood, after which they gradually decrease with increasing age. Several observations suggest that there is a premature and progressive age-related decline in serum IGF-I bioactivity in type 2 diabetics, which eventually results in a (relative) IGF-I deficiency. In type 2 diabetics, close relationships have been demonstrated between glycaemic control and serum IGF-I levels, with worse control being associated with lower IGF-I levels. Several studies (in non-diabetics) suggest that lowered circulating IGF-I levels account for a poor outcome of CVD. We previously observed in a population-based study that a genetically determined lowered IGF-I expression increases the risk of myocardial infarction with type 2 diabetes. This genetic approach overcomes the problem that cross-sectional studies cannot distinguish whether changes in IGF-I levels are a cause or a consequence of a disease. IGF-I is an important metabolic regulatory hormone. In addition, IGF-I suppresses myocardial apoptosis and improves myocardial function in various models of experimental cardiomyopathy. Compared with other growth factors, the 'survival' effect of IGF-I on myocardium seems rather unique.Therefore, we hypothesize that the premature and progressive decline in serum IGF-I bioactivity in ageing patients with type 2 diabetics is an important pathophysiological abnormality. It contributes not only to elevated glucose and lipid levels, but also to the progression and the poor outcome of CVD. If this hypothesis is proven to be right, treatment with IGF-I as an adjunct to insulin offers great potential and might not only improve metabolic control but also reduce the incidence and prevalence of CVD in type 2 diabetes patients. However, there is as yet no experimental evidence that long-term (replacement) treatment with IGF-I prevents, delays or reduces CVD in type 2 diabetes patients. Clinical trials are necessary to prove that long-term IGF-I treatment, preferably in the form of a better-tolerated IGF-I/IGF-binding protein-3 complex, improves the overall cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes.
2型糖尿病患者外周、脑血管和心血管疾病(CVD)的发病率约为非糖尿病人群的两倍。传统的心血管危险因素,如血脂、脂蛋白和高血压,只能部分解释发生动脉粥样硬化和CVD的这种额外风险。对非糖尿病人群进行的研究的荟萃分析表明,CVD风险随着血糖水平高于4.2 mmol/l而持续增加。葡萄糖假说认为,使血糖水平正常化的治疗可预防或延缓糖尿病的长期并发症。然而,英国前瞻性糖尿病研究的结果表明,血糖控制并不能完全预防CVD。在健康受试者中,血清IGF-I水平在成年早期达到峰值,此后随着年龄增长逐渐下降。多项观察结果表明,2型糖尿病患者血清IGF-I生物活性存在与年龄相关的过早且渐进性下降,最终导致(相对)IGF-I缺乏。在2型糖尿病患者中,血糖控制与血清IGF-I水平之间已证实存在密切关系,控制较差与较低的IGF-I水平相关。多项研究(在非糖尿病患者中)表明,循环IGF-I水平降低是CVD不良结局的原因。我们之前在一项基于人群的研究中观察到,基因决定的IGF-I表达降低会增加2型糖尿病患者发生心肌梗死的风险。这种基因研究方法克服了横断面研究无法区分IGF-I水平变化是疾病的原因还是结果这一问题。IGF-I是一种重要的代谢调节激素。此外,在各种实验性心肌病模型中,IGF-I可抑制心肌细胞凋亡并改善心肌功能。与其他生长因子相比,IGF-I对心肌的“存活”作用似乎相当独特。因此,我们假设老年2型糖尿病患者血清IGF-I生物活性的过早且渐进性下降是一种重要的病理生理异常。它不仅导致血糖和血脂水平升高,并导致CVD的进展和不良结局。如果这一假设被证明是正确的,用IGF-I作为胰岛素的辅助治疗具有巨大潜力,可能不仅改善代谢控制,还能降低2型糖尿病患者CVD的发病率和患病率。然而,目前尚无实验证据表明用IGF-I进行长期(替代)治疗可预防、延缓或降低2型糖尿病患者的CVD。需要进行临床试验来证明长期使用IGF-I治疗,最好是以耐受性更好的IGF-I/IGF结合蛋白-3复合物形式,可改善2型糖尿病患者的整体心血管风险。