• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测夫妻何时会离婚的双因素模型:基于14年纵向数据的探索性分析

A two-factor model for predicting when a couple will divorce: exploratory analyses using 14-year longitudinal data.

作者信息

Gottman John Mordechai, Levenson Robert Wayne

机构信息

Institute for Personality Research, Department of Psychology, University of California, USA.

出版信息

Fam Process. 2002 Spring;41(1):83-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2002.40102000083.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2002.40102000083.x
PMID:11924092
Abstract

This article examines 14-year longitudinal data and attempts to create a post hoc model that uses Time-1 data to "predict" the length of time the marriage will last. The sample consists of the 21 couples (of 79 studied) who divorced over a 14-year period. A two-factor model is proposed. One factor is the amount of unregulated volatile positive and negative affect in the marriage, and this factor predicts a short marriage length for the divorcing couples. A second factor is called "neutral affective style," and this factor predicts a long marriage length for the divorcing couples. This model is compared to a Time-1 model of ailing marriage in which Time-1 marital satisfaction is used to predict the timing of divorce.

摘要

本文研究了14年的纵向数据,并尝试建立一个事后模型,该模型使用时间1的数据来“预测”婚姻将持续的时长。样本由在14年期间离婚的21对夫妇(共研究了79对夫妇)组成。提出了一个双因素模型。一个因素是婚姻中未加调节的易变的积极和消极情绪的数量,这个因素预测离婚夫妇的婚姻持续时间较短。第二个因素被称为“中性情感风格”,这个因素预测离婚夫妇的婚姻持续时间较长。将这个模型与一个婚姻不佳的时间1模型进行比较,在该模型中,时间1的婚姻满意度被用来预测离婚时间。

相似文献

1
A two-factor model for predicting when a couple will divorce: exploratory analyses using 14-year longitudinal data.预测夫妻何时会离婚的双因素模型:基于14年纵向数据的探索性分析
Fam Process. 2002 Spring;41(1):83-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2002.40102000083.x.
2
Why do even satisfied newlyweds eventually go on to divorce?为什么即使是满意的新婚夫妇最终也会离婚?
J Fam Psychol. 2012 Feb;26(1):1-10. doi: 10.1037/a0025966. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
3
Rebound from marital conflict and divorce prediction.婚姻冲突的反弹与离婚预测。
Fam Process. 1999 Fall;38(3):287-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1999.00287.x.
4
Treatment-as-Usual for Couples: Trajectories Before and After Beginning Couple Therapy.常规治疗夫妻组:开始夫妻治疗前后的轨迹。
Fam Process. 2019 Jun;58(2):273-286. doi: 10.1111/famp.12390. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
5
Searching for a two-factor model of marriage duration: commentary on Gottman and Levenson.探寻婚姻持续时间的双因素模型:对戈特曼和莱文森的评论
Fam Process. 2002 Spring;41(1):97-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2002.40102000097.x.
6
Interpersonal mediators in the intergenerational transmission of marital dysfunction.婚姻功能障碍代际传递中的人际调解因素
J Fam Psychol. 2004 Sep;18(3):519-29. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.18.3.519.
7
Do cold feet warn of trouble ahead? Premarital uncertainty and four-year marital outcomes.脚冷是否预示着麻烦将至?婚前的不确定性与四年婚姻结果。
J Fam Psychol. 2012 Dec;26(6):1012-7. doi: 10.1037/a0029912. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
8
Love, marriage, and divorce: newlyweds' stress hormones foreshadow relationship changes.爱情、婚姻与离婚:新婚夫妇的应激激素预示着关系的变化。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Feb;71(1):176-88. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.71.1.176.
9
How does personality matter in marriage? An examination of trait anxiety, interpersonal negativity, and marital satisfaction.个性在婚姻中如何重要?对特质焦虑、人际消极性和婚姻满意度的考察。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Feb;78(2):326-36. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.78.2.326.
10
Predicting divorce among newlyweds from the first three minutes of a marital conflict discussion.通过婚姻冲突讨论的前三分钟预测新婚夫妇的离婚情况。
Fam Process. 1999 Fall;38(3):293-301. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1999.00293.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Partners Now Parents: Supporting Couples During the Journey to Parenthood.伴侣变父母:在为人父母的旅程中支持夫妻。
Fam Process. 2025 Mar;64(1):e13097. doi: 10.1111/famp.13097.
2
Development and validation of the relational behavior interactions scale for couples.夫妻关系行为互动量表的编制与验证。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 6;14(1):8086. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58901-2.
3
A day in the life: Couples' everyday communication and subsequent relationship outcomes.日常生活中的一天:夫妻之间的日常沟通及其对后续关系结果的影响。
J Fam Psychol. 2024 Apr;38(3):453-465. doi: 10.1037/fam0001180. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
4
Divorce and risk of suicide attempt: a Swedish national study.离婚与自杀未遂风险:一项瑞典全国性研究。
Psychol Med. 2024 Jun;54(8):1620-1628. doi: 10.1017/S0033291723003513. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
5
Relational needs frustration: an observational study on the role of negative (dis)engaging emotions.关系需求受挫:关于消极(脱离)参与情绪作用的一项观察性研究
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 23;14:1232125. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1232125. eCollection 2023.
6
Interpersonal Stress and Late Adolescent Depressive Symptoms: Moderation by Perceptual Sensitivity to Facial Expression of Anger.人际关系压力与青少年晚期抑郁症状:对面部愤怒表情知觉敏感性的调节作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2023 Dec;52(12):2592-2605. doi: 10.1007/s10964-023-01849-9. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
7
The relationship sabotage scale: an evaluation of factor analyses and constructive validity.关系破坏量表:因子分析与构建效度评估。
BMC Psychol. 2021 Sep 19;9(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00644-0.
8
Feedback From Facial Expressions Contribute to Slow Learning Rate in an Iowa Gambling Task.面部表情反馈导致爱荷华赌博任务中的学习速度缓慢。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 9;12:684249. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.684249. eCollection 2021.
9
CD38 is associated with bonding-relevant cognitions and relationship satisfaction over the first 3 years of marriage.CD38 与婚姻头 3 年的粘结相关认知和关系满意度有关。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 3;11(1):2965. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82307-z.
10
Two's Company, Three's a Crowd? Maternal and Paternal Talk About Their Infant Differs in Associations With Wellbeing, Couple Relationship Quality, and Caregiving Sensitivity.两人成伴,三人添乱?父母谈论他们的婴儿在与幸福感、夫妻关系质量和照顾敏感性的关联上存在差异。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 19;11:578632. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.578632. eCollection 2020.