Kelly Michelle, Dunbar Sandra, Gray John E, O'Reilly Richard L
Research and Education Unit, Regional Mental Health Care, St Joseph's Health Care, London, Ontario.
Can J Psychiatry. 2002 Mar;47(2):181-5. doi: 10.1177/070674370204700209.
To determine the duration of delays in treatment initiation when involuntary patients apply for a review of a finding of treatment incapacity and to estimate the cost of keeping patients hospitalized without treatment in these circumstances.
Using a computerized database and written records, we identified all patients at 2 psychiatric hospitals in Ontario who applied for a review of a finding of treatment incapacity during a 10-year period. We recorded clinical and demographic variables, dates of stopping and starting medication, and dates of review board hearings and outcomes. We also noted all cases in which a patient appealed a decision from the review board to the court.
Two hundred and thirty-seven patients made 334 applications to the review board. The board overturned the physician's finding of incapacity in only 5 (1.5%) applications; 15 appealed the review board's finding to the courts. None of these appeals were successful. In the absence of an appeal to the courts, the average delay in initiating treatment was 25 days. For patients appealing to the court, the average delay was 253 days. The cost of hospitalizing untreated patients while their capacity was under legal review was estimated at $3,867,000, of which $1,333,000 could have been saved if treatment had started immediately after the review board confirmed incapacity.
We have identified extensive delays in initiating psychiatric treatment for a number of patients. These delays are associated with legal review of treatment capacity. There are serious clinical risks and substantial costs associated with delay in treating patients with acute psychiatric illness. Where jurisdictions review treatment capacity, we recommend that treatment not be impeded once a review board has confirmed a clinical finding of incapacity.
确定非自愿患者申请对治疗无行为能力判定进行复审时治疗开始延迟的时长,并估算在此情况下患者未接受治疗而住院的费用。
利用计算机化数据库和书面记录,我们识别出安大略省2家精神病医院在10年期间申请对治疗无行为能力判定进行复审的所有患者。我们记录了临床和人口统计学变量、停药和用药起始日期、复审委员会听证会日期及结果。我们还记录了所有患者不服复审委员会决定而向法院上诉的案例。
237名患者向复审委员会提出了334次申请。复审委员会仅在5次(1.5%)申请中推翻了医生的无行为能力判定;15名患者不服复审委员会的判定而向法院上诉。这些上诉均未成功。在未向法院上诉的情况下,治疗开始的平均延迟为25天。对于向法院上诉的患者,平均延迟为253天。在其行为能力接受法律审查期间,未接受治疗的患者住院费用估计为386.7万美元,如果在复审委员会确认无行为能力后立即开始治疗,其中133.3万美元本可节省。
我们发现许多患者在开始精神科治疗方面存在长时间延迟。这些延迟与对治疗行为能力的法律审查有关。对于急性精神疾病患者,延迟治疗会带来严重的临床风险和巨大成本。在各司法管辖区对治疗行为能力进行审查的情况下,我们建议一旦复审委员会确认了临床无行为能力判定,治疗就不应受到阻碍。