Samsa Gregory P, Govert Joseph, Matchar David B, McCrory Douglas C
Center for Clinical Health Policy Research, Duke University, Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002 Jan-Feb;39(1):41-52.
Evidence reports summarize the evidence pertaining to various health-related topics. Including evidence from nonrandomized studies into such reports involves a trade-off between availability and bias. We describe a general framework by which information from nonrandomized studies might be integrated reasonably into evidence reports and illustrate its application to a recent evidence report on preventing pulmonary complications among patients with spinal cord injury. The proposed framework, which is based upon the premise that producing a fair summary of the evidence requires only a level of evidence judged by clinical experts to be sufficient to the task at hand, may help focus scarce resources, strengthen the quality and documentation of decisions including evidence from nonrandomized studies, and suggest high-priority areas for future research.
证据报告总结了与各种健康相关主题有关的证据。将非随机研究的证据纳入此类报告,需要在可获得性和偏倚之间进行权衡。我们描述了一个通用框架,通过该框架,非随机研究的信息可以合理地整合到证据报告中,并举例说明其在最近一份关于预防脊髓损伤患者肺部并发症的证据报告中的应用。所提出的框架基于这样一个前提,即对证据进行公正总结只需要临床专家判断足以完成手头任务的证据水平,这可能有助于集中稀缺资源,加强包括非随机研究证据在内的决策的质量和记录,并为未来研究提出高度优先的领域。