Wallace J L
Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Dig Liver Dis. 2002 Feb;34(2):89-94. doi: 10.1016/s1590-8658(02)80234-1.
An enormous amount of fanfare and marketing preceded the introduction of selective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase-2 to the marketplace. These drugs were purported to offer equivalent anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects to conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs without causing gastrointestinal injury. Now that there is considerable clinical experience with four drugs of this class having been available for at least two years, it is worthwhile re-visiting some of the original claims to determine whether selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors have thus far lived up to their promise. In short, selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors have proven to be somewhat safer in terms of gastrointestinal toxicity, than some (but not all) conventional non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs. However their efficacy of the selective cyclooxygenase inhibitors has not always matched that of the conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and there are significant safety concerns with some of the new drugs that deserve very careful consideration.
在环氧化酶-2选择性抑制剂进入市场之前,进行了大量的宣传和营销活动。这些药物据称能提供与传统非甾体抗炎药相当的抗炎和镇痛效果,同时不会造成胃肠道损伤。鉴于这一类别的四种药物已有至少两年的大量临床经验,重新审视一些最初的说法,以确定选择性环氧化酶-2抑制剂是否兑现了其承诺是很有必要的。简而言之,就胃肠道毒性而言,选择性环氧化酶-2抑制剂已被证明比某些(但不是所有)传统非甾体抗炎药更安全一些。然而,选择性环氧化酶抑制剂的疗效并不总是与传统非甾体抗炎药相当,并且一些新药存在重大安全问题,值得非常仔细地考虑。