Sasaki Chiye, Yokoyama Ai, Itoh Yoshifumi, Hashimoto Masayuki, Watanabe Takeshi, Fukamizo Tamo
Laboratory of Enzyme System Science, Department of Food and Nutrition, Kinki University, Nakamachi, Nara 631-8505, Japan.
J Biochem. 2002 Apr;131(4):557-64. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a003134.
Hydrolytic mechanisms of family 18 chitinases from rice (Oryza sativa L.) and Bacillus circulans WL-12 were comparatively studied by a combination of HPLC analysis of the reaction products and theoretical calculation of reaction time-courses. All of the enzymes tested produced beta-anomers from chitin hexasaccharide [(GlcNAc)(6)], indicating that they catalyze the hydrolysis through a retaining mechanism. The rice chitinases hydrolyzed predominantly the fourth and fifth glycosidic linkages from the nonreducing end of (GlcNAc)(6), whereas B. circulans chitinase A1 hydrolyzed the second linkage from the nonreducing end. In addition, the Bacillus enzyme efficiently catalyzed transglycosylation, producing significant amounts of chitin oligomers larger than the initial substrate, but the rice chitinases did not. The time-courses of (GlcNAc)(6) degradation obtained by HPLC were analyzed by theoretical calculation, and the subsite structures of the rice chitinases were identified to be (-4)(-3)(-2)(-1)(+1)(+2). From the HPLC profile of the reaction products previously reported [Terwisscha van Scheltinga et al. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 15619-15623], family 18 chitinase from rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) was estimated to have the same type of subsite structure. Theoretical analysis of the reaction time-course for the Bacillus enzyme revealed that the enzyme has (-2)(-1) (+1)(+2)(+3)(+4)-type subsite structure, which is identical to that of fungal chitinase from Coccidioides immitis [Fukamizo et al. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 2448-2454]. The Bacillus enzyme also resembled the fungal chitinase in its transglycosylation activity. Minor structural differences between plant and microbial enzymes appear to result in such functional variations, even though all of these chitinases are classified into the identical family of glycosyl hydrolases.
通过对反应产物进行高效液相色谱(HPLC)分析以及对反应时间进程进行理论计算,对水稻(Oryza sativa L.)和环状芽孢杆菌WL-12中18家族几丁质酶的水解机制进行了比较研究。所有测试的酶都从几丁质六糖[(GlcNAc)6]产生β-异头物,这表明它们通过保留机制催化水解。水稻几丁质酶主要水解(GlcNAc)6非还原端的第四和第五糖苷键,而环状芽孢杆菌几丁质酶A1水解非还原端的第二个键。此外,芽孢杆菌酶有效地催化转糖基化反应,产生大量比初始底物更大的几丁质寡聚物,但水稻几丁质酶则不会。通过理论计算分析了HPLC获得的(GlcNAc)6降解的时间进程,确定水稻几丁质酶的亚位点结构为(-4)(-3)(-2)(-1)(+1)(+2)。根据先前报道的反应产物的HPLC图谱[Terwisscha van Scheltinga等人(1995年)《生物化学》34,15619 - 15623],估计橡胶树(Hevea brasiliensis)的18家族几丁质酶具有相同类型的亚位点结构。对芽孢杆菌酶反应时间进程的理论分析表明,该酶具有(-2)(-1)(+1)(+2)(+3)(+4)型亚位点结构,这与来自粗球孢子菌的真菌几丁质酶的结构相同[Fukamizo等人(2001年)《生物化学》40,2448 - 2454]。芽孢杆菌酶在转糖基化活性方面也与真菌几丁质酶相似。尽管所有这些几丁质酶都被归类为相同的糖基水解酶家族,但植物和微生物酶之间的微小结构差异似乎导致了这种功能差异。