• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

隐匿性原发灶所致的颈部淋巴结转移:未分化癌与鳞状细胞癌的比较

Cervical nodal metastases from occult primary: undifferentiated carcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma.

作者信息

Tong Chi-Chung, Luk Mai-Yee, Chow Sin-Ming, Ngan Kai-Cheong, Lau Wai-Hon

机构信息

Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 30 Gascoigne Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Head Neck. 2002 Apr;24(4):361-9. doi: 10.1002/hed.10054.

DOI:10.1002/hed.10054
PMID:11933178
Abstract

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: Controversy exists regarding the management of cervical lymph node metastases from occult primary. Oncologists face a major challenge in adopting an optimal approach. This study attempted to compare the clinical course of two different histologic findings of this disease entity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed for all patients referred to our institution between 1988 and 1998 with cervical lymph node metastases from an unknown primary. Case records of consecutive unselected patients with histologically confirmed carcinoma in cervical lymph nodes were reviewed. Those with histologic findings other than squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) or undifferentiated carcinoma (UDC) and lymphadenopathies at the supraclavicular fossa alone or below the clavicles at the time of diagnosis were excluded. There were 45 patients identified with a mean follow-up of 36 months (range, 4-110 months). Thirty-seven were men and eight were women. The mean age was 57 (range, 29-91). There were 32 patients with SCC and 13 patients with UDC. Treatment modality included surgery (S) alone in 1 patient (2%), radiotherapy (RT) alone in 24 patients (53%), and combined modality in 20 patients (45%). (Twelve patients (27%) had combined S and RT, 8 patients (18%) had combined chemotherapy and RT.) Twenty-eight patients (62%) were treated with radical intent. For those patients treated by radical RT, the RT field covered both sides of the neck and the potential mucosal primary (PMP) sites, including the entire pharyngeal axis. The median radiation doses to the lymph nodes and the PMP were 65 Gy (range, 60-70 Gy) and 60 Gy (range, 40-70 Gy), respectively.

RESULTS

At the time of analysis, ultimate control of disease above the clavicles according to N stage, treatment intent, and histologic type was as follows: N1s, 7 of 7 (100%); N2s, 15 of 26 (58%); N3s, 1 of 12 (8%); radical intent, 19 of 28 (68%); palliative intent, 3 of 17 (18%); UDC, 11 of 13 (85%); SCC,11 of 32 (34%). Eleven patients remained alive and disease free, with a median follow-up of 79 months (range, 27-110 months). The 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) for the radical treatment group and the palliative treatment group were 67% and 18%, respectively (p =.0011). Significant difference in 5-year DSS was observed among the different N groups: 100% for N1s, 55% for N2s, and 0% for N3s, respectively (p =.0001). There was also a significant difference in the 5-year DSS between UDC and SCC: 81% for UDC vs 34% for SCC (p =.01). No significant difference in the 5-year DSS was observed on the basis of treatment modality in the radically treated group: 63% for RT alone vs 75% for S + RT (p =.711).

CONCLUSIONS

UDC histologic findings in our series are associated with better locoregional control and DSS than SCC. Our results in local control, emergence of primary tumor, and DSS are comparable with other published data. However, disease control of advanced nodal stage remains poor; more aggressive treatment approaches, like the use of concurrent chemoradiation or altered fractionation scheme, should be explored.

摘要

目的/目标:隐匿性原发灶颈部淋巴结转移的管理存在争议。肿瘤学家在采用最佳方法上面临重大挑战。本研究试图比较该疾病实体两种不同组织学表现的临床过程。

材料与方法

对1988年至1998年间转诊至我院的所有颈部淋巴结转移但原发灶不明的患者进行回顾性分析。回顾连续入选的颈部淋巴结组织学确诊为癌的患者的病例记录。排除那些组织学表现不是鳞状细胞癌(SCC)或未分化癌(UDC)以及诊断时仅锁骨上窝或锁骨以下有淋巴结病的患者。共确定45例患者,平均随访36个月(范围4 - 110个月)。男性37例,女性8例。平均年龄57岁(范围29 - 91岁)。其中SCC患者32例,UDC患者13例。治疗方式包括:1例患者(2%)仅行手术(S),24例患者(53%)仅行放疗(RT),20例患者(45%)采用综合治疗。(12例患者(27%)行手术加放疗,8例患者(18%)行化疗加放疗。)28例患者(62%)接受根治性治疗。对于接受根治性放疗的患者,放疗野覆盖颈部双侧及潜在黏膜原发灶(PMP)部位,包括整个咽轴。淋巴结和PMP的中位放疗剂量分别为65 Gy(范围60 - 70 Gy)和60 Gy(范围40 - 70 Gy)。

结果

分析时,根据N分期、治疗目的和组织学类型,锁骨上疾病的最终控制情况如下:N1s,7例中的7例(100%);N2s,26例中的15例(58%);N3s,12例中的1例(8%);根治性目的,28例中的19例(68%);姑息性目的,17例中的3例(18%);UDC,13例中的11例(85%);SCC,32例中的11例(34%)。11例患者存活且无疾病,中位随访79个月(范围27 - 110个月)。根治性治疗组和姑息性治疗组的5年疾病特异性生存率(DSS)分别为67%和18%(p = 0.0011)。不同N组间5年DSS存在显著差异:N1s为100%,N2s为55%,N3s为0%(p = 0.0001)。UDC和SCC的5年DSS也存在显著差异:UDC为81%,SCC为34%(p = 0.01)。在根治性治疗组中,基于治疗方式的5年DSS未观察到显著差异:单纯放疗为63%,手术加放疗为75%(p = 0.711)。

结论

在我们的系列研究中,UDC组织学表现与比SCC更好的局部区域控制和DSS相关。我们在局部控制、原发肿瘤出现情况和DSS方面的结果与其他已发表数据相当。然而,晚期淋巴结分期的疾病控制仍然较差;应探索更积极的治疗方法,如使用同步放化疗或改变分割方案。

相似文献

1
Cervical nodal metastases from occult primary: undifferentiated carcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma.隐匿性原发灶所致的颈部淋巴结转移:未分化癌与鳞状细胞癌的比较
Head Neck. 2002 Apr;24(4):361-9. doi: 10.1002/hed.10054.
2
Carcinoma metastatic to cervical lymph nodes from an occult primary tumor: the outcome after combined-modality therapy.隐匿性原发肿瘤转移至颈部淋巴结的癌:综合治疗后的结局
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 May;14(5):1575-82. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9329-9. Epub 2007 Feb 16.
3
[Diagnosis and treatment of 39 patients with cervical lymph node metastases of squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary origin, referred to Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1979-98].[1979年至1998年转诊至荷兰癌症研究所/安托尼·范·列文虎克医院的39例原发灶不明的鳞状细胞癌颈部淋巴结转移患者的诊断与治疗]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2000 Jul 8;144(28):1355-60.
4
Lymph node metastasis in maxillary sinus carcinoma.上颌窦癌的淋巴结转移
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Feb 1;46(3):541-9. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00453-8.
5
Radio(chemo)therapy in the management of squamous cell carcinoma of cervical lymph nodes from an unknown primary site. A retrospective analysis.放射性(化疗)疗法在治疗不明原发灶的宫颈淋巴结鳞状细胞癌中的应用。一项回顾性分析。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2012 Jan;188(1):56-61. doi: 10.1007/s00066-011-0017-8. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
6
The influence of lymph node metastasis in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx: N0 versus N+.淋巴结转移对口腔、口咽、喉和下咽鳞状细胞癌治疗的影响:N0与N+的对比
Laryngoscope. 2005 Apr;115(4):629-39. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000161338.54515.b1.
7
Treatment for retropharyngeal metastatic undifferentiated squamous cell carcinoma from an unknown primary site: results of a prospective study with irradiation to nasopharyngeal mucosa plus bilateral neck.原发部位不明的咽后转移性未分化鳞状细胞癌的治疗:一项对鼻咽黏膜加双侧颈部进行放疗的前瞻性研究结果
Oncotarget. 2017 Jun 27;8(26):42372-42381. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16344.
8
Cervical lymph node metastases from occult squamous cell carcinoma: analysis of 82 cases.隐匿性鳞状细胞癌的颈部淋巴结转移:82例分析
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2006;68(4):189-94. doi: 10.1159/000091394. Epub 2006 Feb 8.
9
Management of stage IV glottic carcinoma: therapeutic outcomes.IV期声门癌的治疗:治疗结果
Laryngoscope. 2004 Aug;114(8):1438-46. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200408000-00024.
10
[Therapy pf cervical lymph node metastases of unknown primary tumor].[原发灶不明的颈部淋巴结转移瘤的治疗]
Strahlenther Onkol. 1997 Jul;173(7):362-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03038239.

引用本文的文献

1
Biopsy of cervical lymph node does not impact the survival of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.颈淋巴结活检不影响鼻咽癌的生存。
Cancer Med. 2021 Oct;10(19):6687-6696. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4204. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
2
Additional Cervical Lymph Node Biopsy is Not a Significant Prognostic Factor for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in the Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Era: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis from an Epidemic Area.在调强放射治疗时代,额外的颈部淋巴结活检对鼻咽癌并非重要的预后因素:来自流行地区的倾向评分匹配分析
J Cancer. 2018 Jul 30;9(16):2844-2851. doi: 10.7150/jca.25505. eCollection 2018.
3
Treatment for retropharyngeal metastatic undifferentiated squamous cell carcinoma from an unknown primary site: results of a prospective study with irradiation to nasopharyngeal mucosa plus bilateral neck.
原发部位不明的咽后转移性未分化鳞状细胞癌的治疗:一项对鼻咽黏膜加双侧颈部进行放疗的前瞻性研究结果
Oncotarget. 2017 Jun 27;8(26):42372-42381. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16344.
4
Update from the 4th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Head and Neck Tumours: What Is New in the 2017 WHO Blue Book for Tumors and Tumor-Like Lesions of the Neck and Lymph Nodes.世界卫生组织头颈部肿瘤分类第4版更新内容:2017年世界卫生组织颈部及淋巴结肿瘤与肿瘤样病变蓝皮书有哪些新内容。
Head Neck Pathol. 2017 Mar;11(1):48-54. doi: 10.1007/s12105-017-0796-z. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
5
Optimization of radiotherapy for neck carcinoma metastasis from unknown primary sites: a meta-analysis.未知原发部位颈部癌转移放疗的优化:一项荟萃分析。
Oncotarget. 2016 Nov 29;7(48):78736-78746. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12852.
6
Radio(chemo)therapy in the management of squamous cell carcinoma of cervical lymph nodes from an unknown primary site. A retrospective analysis.放射性(化疗)疗法在治疗不明原发灶的宫颈淋巴结鳞状细胞癌中的应用。一项回顾性分析。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2012 Jan;188(1):56-61. doi: 10.1007/s00066-011-0017-8. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
7
Metastatic squamous cell carcinoma neck with occult primary: A retrospective analysis.隐匿性原发灶的颈部转移性鳞状细胞癌:一项回顾性分析。
Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2009 Oct;30(4):124-30. doi: 10.4103/0971-5851.65334.
8
Cervical lymph node metastases of squamous cell carcinoma from an unknown primary site: a favourable prognosis subset of patients with CUP.原发部位不明的鳞状细胞癌颈部淋巴结转移:CUP患者中预后良好的亚组。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2009 Jun;11(6):340-8. doi: 10.1007/s12094-009-0367-1.
9
Diagnosis and management of neck metastases from an unknown primary.不明原发灶颈部转移瘤的诊断与处理
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Feb;25(1):2-12.