Spector Gershon J, Sessions Donald G, Lenox Jason, Newland Donald, Simpson Joseph, Haughey Bruce H
Department of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Laryngoscope. 2004 Aug;114(8):1438-46. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200408000-00024.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The best therapeutic approach for the treatment of stage IV glottic carcinoma is controversial.
A retrospective study.
A retrospective study of Tumor Research Project data was performed using patients with stage IV glottic squamous cell carcinoma treated with curative intent by five different treatment modalities from 1955 to 1998 at Washington University School of Medicine and Barnes-Jewish Hospital (St. Louis, MO).
Ninety-six patients with stage IV glottic carcinoma were treated by five modalities: total laryngectomy (TL) (n = 13), total laryngectomy with neck dissection (TL/ND) (n = 18), radiation therapy alone (RT) (n = 7) (median dose, 69.5 Gy), total laryngectomy combined with radiation therapy (TL/RT) (n = 10), and total laryngectomy and neck dissection combined with radiation therapy (TL/ND/RT) (n = 48). The overall 5-year observed survival (OS) rate was 39%, and the 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate was 45%. The 5-year DSS rates for the individual treatment modalities included the following: TL, 58.3%; TL/ND, 42.9%; RT, 50.0%; TL/RT, 30.0%; and TL/ND/RT, 43.9%. There was no significant difference in DSS for any individual treatment modality (P =.759). The overall locoregional control rate was 69% (66 of 96). The overall recurrence rate was 39% with recurrence at the primary site and in the neck at 19% and 17%, respectively. Recurrence was not related to treatment modality. The 5-year DSS after treatment of locally recurrent cancer (salvage rate) was 30% (3 of 10) and for recurrent neck disease (28 of 67) was 42%. The incidence of delayed regional metastases was 28%; of distant metastasis, 12%; and of second primary cancers, 9%. There was no statistically significant difference in survival between node-negative (N0) necks initially treated (5-y DSS, 31%) versus N0 necks observed and later treated if necessary (5-y DSS, 44%) (P =.685).
The five treatment modalities had statistically similar survival, recurrence, and complication rates. The overall 5-year DSS for patients with stage IV glottic carcinoma was 45%, and the OS was 39%. The cumulative disease-specific survival (CDSS) was 0.4770 with a mean survival of 10.1 years and a median survival of 3.9 years. Patients younger than age 55 years had better survival (DSS) than patients 56 years of age or older (P =.0002). Patients with early T stage had better survival than patients with more advanced T stage (P =.04). Tumor recurrence at the primary site (P =.0001) and in the neck (P =.014) and distant metastasis (P =.0001) had a deleterious effect on survival. Tumor recurrence was not related to treatment modality. Patients with clear margins of resection had a statistically significant improved survival (DSS and CDSS) compared with patients with close or involved margins (P =.0001). Post-treatment quality of life was not significantly related to treatment modality. Patients whose N0 neck was treated with observation and appropriate treatment for subsequent neck disease had statistically similar survival compared with patients whose N0 neck was treated prophylactically at the time of treatment of the primary. A minimum of 7 years of follow-up is recommended for early identification of recurrent disease, second primary tumors, and distant metastasis. None of the standard treatment modalities currently employed has a statistical advantage regarding survival, recurrence, complications, or quality of life.
目的/假设:IV期声门癌的最佳治疗方法存在争议。
一项回顾性研究。
对肿瘤研究项目数据进行回顾性研究,研究对象为1955年至1998年在华盛顿大学医学院和巴恩斯犹太医院(密苏里州圣路易斯)接受五种不同治疗方式、以治愈为目的的IV期声门鳞状细胞癌患者。
96例IV期声门癌患者接受了五种治疗方式:全喉切除术(TL)(n = 13)、全喉切除术加颈部清扫术(TL/ND)(n = 18)、单纯放疗(RT)(n = 7)(中位剂量,69.5 Gy)、全喉切除术联合放疗(TL/RT)(n = 10)以及全喉切除术、颈部清扫术联合放疗(TL/ND/RT)(n = 48)。总体5年观察生存率(OS)为39%,5年疾病特异性生存率(DSS)为45%。各治疗方式的5年DSS率如下:TL,58.3%;TL/ND,42.9%;RT,50.0%;TL/RT,30.0%;TL/ND/RT,43.9%。任何一种治疗方式的DSS均无显著差异(P = 0.759)。总体局部区域控制率为69%(96例中的66例)。总体复发率为39%,原发部位和颈部复发率分别为19%和17%。复发与治疗方式无关。局部复发癌治疗后的5年DSS(挽救率)为30%(10例中的3例),颈部复发疾病(67例中的28例)为42%。延迟区域转移发生率为28%;远处转移发生率为12%;第二原发癌发生率为9%。初始接受治疗的淋巴结阴性(N0)颈部患者(5年DSS,31%)与观察到N0颈部且必要时随后治疗的患者(5年DSS,44%)之间的生存率无统计学显著差异(P = 0.685)。
五种治疗方式在生存率、复发率和并发症发生率方面在统计学上相似。IV期声门癌患者的总体5年DSS为45%,OS为39%。累积疾病特异性生存率(CDSS)为0.4770,平均生存期为10.1年,中位生存期为3.9年。年龄小于55岁的患者比56岁及以上患者的生存率(DSS)更好(P = 0.0002)。T分期早的患者比T分期晚的患者生存率更好(P = 0.04)。原发部位(P = 0.0001)、颈部(P = 0.014)和远处转移(P = 0.0001)的肿瘤复发对生存率有有害影响。肿瘤复发与治疗方式无关。与切缘接近或受累的患者相比,切缘清晰的患者在统计学上生存率(DSS和CDSS)显著提高(P = 0.0001)。治疗后的生活质量与治疗方式无显著相关。对于N0颈部接受观察并对随后颈部疾病进行适当治疗的患者,与原发治疗时对N0颈部进行预防性治疗的患者相比,生存率在统计学上相似。建议至少随访7年以早期识别复发疾病、第二原发肿瘤和远处转移。目前采用的任何一种标准治疗方式在生存率、复发、并发症或生活质量方面均无统计学优势。