• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

警示信号的协同进化

The coevolution of warning signals.

作者信息

Sherratt Thomas N

机构信息

School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, University of Durham, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Apr 7;269(1492):741-6. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1944.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2001.1944
PMID:11934367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1690947/
Abstract

It has long been recognized that defended prey tend to be conspicuous. Current theories suggest that the association ('aposematism') has arisen because predators more readily learn to avoid attacking defended phenotypes when they are conspicuous. In this paper, I consider why such psychology has evolved. In particular, I argue that aposematism may have evolved not because of an independent and pre-existing receiver bias, but because the conspicuousness of a prey item provides a reliable indicator of its likelihood of being defended. To develop my case I consider how warning signals might coevolve in a system containing a number of predators, whose foraging behaviour is also subject to selection. In these cases, models readily show that the greater the conspicuousness of a novel prey item, the more likely that it has been encountered by other predators and survived. As a consequence, naive predators should be less likely to attack highly conspicuous novel prey on encounter, or at least more inclined to attack them cautiously. This adaptive predator behaviour will greatly facilitate the spread of aposematic phenotypes from extreme rarity, which in turn will enhance selection for forms of predator behaviour under which aposematism will coevolve even more readily.

摘要

长期以来,人们一直认识到具有防御能力的猎物往往很显眼。当前的理论认为,这种关联(“警戒色”)的出现是因为当具有防御能力的表型显眼时,捕食者更容易学会避免攻击它们。在本文中,我思考了这种心理为何会进化。具体而言,我认为警戒色的进化可能并非由于独立且预先存在的接收者偏差,而是因为猎物的显眼性提供了其具有防御能力可能性的可靠指标。为了阐述我的观点,我考虑了在一个包含多种捕食者的系统中,警告信号可能如何共同进化,这些捕食者的觅食行为也会受到选择的影响。在这些情况下,模型很容易表明,一种新猎物越显眼,就越有可能被其他捕食者遇到并存活下来。因此,初次遇到新猎物时,天真的捕食者应该不太可能攻击高度显眼的新猎物,或者至少更倾向于谨慎地攻击它们。这种适应性的捕食者行为将极大地促进警戒色表型从极其罕见的状态传播开来,这反过来又会增强对捕食者行为形式的选择,在这种行为形式下,警戒色将更容易共同进化。

相似文献

1
The coevolution of warning signals.警示信号的协同进化
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Apr 7;269(1492):741-6. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1944.
2
Conditions for the spread of conspicuous warning signals: a numerical model with novel insights.显著警告信号的传播条件:一个具有新颖见解的数值模型
Evolution. 2006 Nov;60(11):2246-56.
3
Warning signals and predator-prey coevolution.警告信号与捕食者 - 猎物协同进化
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Sep 7;271(1550):1859-65. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2795.
4
Predator experience on cryptic prey affects the survival of conspicuous aposematic prey.对隐蔽性猎物的捕食者经历会影响显眼的警戒色猎物的生存。
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Feb 22;268(1465):357-61. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1377.
5
Perspective: the evolution of warning coloration is not paradoxical.观点:警戒色的进化并非自相矛盾。
Evolution. 2005 May;59(5):933-40.
6
Aposematic signals and the relationship between conspicuousness and distinctiveness.警戒信号以及醒目性与独特性之间的关系。
J Theor Biol. 2007 Mar 21;245(2):268-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.10.022. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
7
The evolution of warning signals as reliable indicators of prey defense.作为猎物防御可靠指标的警告信号的演变。
Am Nat. 2003 Oct;162(4):377-89. doi: 10.1086/378047. Epub 2003 Oct 16.
8
Predator mixes and the conspicuousness of aposematic signals.捕食者组合与警戒信号的显著度
Am Nat. 2004 Apr;163(4):532-47. doi: 10.1086/382662. Epub 2004 Apr 19.
9
Avian predators attack aposematic prey more forcefully when they are part of an aggregation.当聚集在一起时,食虫鸟类会更猛烈地攻击具有警戒色的猎物。
Biol Lett. 2006 Dec 22;2(4):488-90. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0522.
10
The effects of predator learning, forgetting, and recognition errors on the evolution of warning coloration.捕食者的学习、遗忘和识别错误对警戒色进化的影响。
Evolution. 2000 Jun;54(3):751-63. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00077.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Experience with Aposematic Defense Triggers Attack Bias in a Mantid Predator ().在螳螂捕食者中,警戒色防御的经验引发攻击偏好()。
Integr Org Biol. 2024 Oct 25;6(1):obae039. doi: 10.1093/iob/obae039. eCollection 2024.
2
Intraspecific Variation in the Alkaloids of Adalia decempunctata (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae): Sex, Reproduction and Colour Pattern Polymorphism.异色瓢虫(鞘翅目,瓢虫科)生物碱的种内变异:性别、繁殖与色斑多态性。
J Chem Ecol. 2024 Nov;50(11):790-798. doi: 10.1007/s10886-024-01544-4. Epub 2024 Sep 14.
3
Chemical defences indicate bold colour patterns with reduced variability in aposematic nudibranchs.警戒色软体动物的化学防御呈现出鲜明的颜色图案,且变异性降低。
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Aug;291(2027):20240953. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.0953. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
4
Fatal Attraction: Spiders Lure Male Moth Prey with the Promise of Sex.致命诱惑:蜘蛛以性承诺诱捕雄性蛾类猎物。
Insects. 2024 Jan 12;15(1):53. doi: 10.3390/insects15010053.
5
The evolution of prey-attraction strategies in spiders: the interplay between foraging and predator avoidance.蜘蛛猎物吸引策略的演化:觅食与逃避捕食者之间的相互作用。
Oecologia. 2023 Aug;202(4):669-684. doi: 10.1007/s00442-023-05427-5. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
6
Increasingly cautious sampling, not the black colouration of unpalatable prey, is used by fish in avoidance learning.鱼类在进行回避学习时,使用的是越来越谨慎的取样,而不是不可口的猎物的黑色着色。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Sep;26(5):1705-1711. doi: 10.1007/s10071-023-01815-9. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
7
Signal detectability and boldness are not the same: the function of defensive coloration in nudibranchs is distance-dependent.信号探测能力和大胆程度不同:头足类软体动物防御色的功能是距离依赖的。
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Jul 26;290(2003):20231160. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.1160.
8
Antioxidant availability trades off with warning signals and toxin sequestration in the large milkweed bug ().在大斑蝶(学名:Oncopeltus fasciatus)中,抗氧化剂的可利用性与警示信号及毒素隔离之间存在权衡。
Ecol Evol. 2023 Apr 7;13(4):e9971. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9971. eCollection 2023 Apr.
9
Meta-analytic evidence for quantitative honesty in aposematic signals.警戒信号中定量诚实性的元分析证据。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Apr 28;288(1949):20210679. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0679.
10
Evolution of switchable aposematism: insights from individual-based simulations.可切换警戒色的进化:基于个体模拟的见解
PeerJ. 2020 Apr 10;8:e8915. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8915. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Localization of heart poisons in the monarch butterfly.帝王蝶中心脏毒素的定位。
Science. 1975 Apr 4;188(4183):19-25. doi: 10.1126/science.188.4183.19.
2
Predator experience on cryptic prey affects the survival of conspicuous aposematic prey.对隐蔽性猎物的捕食者经历会影响显眼的警戒色猎物的生存。
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Feb 22;268(1465):357-61. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1377.
3
Can receiver psychology explain the evolution of aposematism?接收者心理学能解释警戒色的进化吗?
Anim Behav. 2001 Jan;61(1):205-216. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1558.
4
Warning signals, receiver psychology and predator memory.警告信号、接收者心理与捕食者记忆。
Anim Behav. 2000 Sep;60(3):269-278. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1430.
5
The effects of predator learning, forgetting, and recognition errors on the evolution of warning coloration.捕食者的学习、遗忘和识别错误对警戒色进化的影响。
Evolution. 2000 Jun;54(3):751-63. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00077.x.
6
The origin of autumn colours by coevolution.秋季色彩的协同进化起源。
J Theor Biol. 2000 Aug 21;205(4):625-30. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2000.2089.
7
Novelty effects in a multimodal warning signal.多模态警告信号中的新奇效应。
Anim Behav. 1999 Feb;57(2):341-346. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0974.
8
Evidence for a peak-shift in predator generalization among aposematic prey.警戒色猎物中捕食者泛化峰值转移的证据。
Proc Biol Sci. 1996 Oct 22;263(1375):1329-34. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1996.0195.
9
Biological signals as handicaps.作为不利条件的生物信号。
J Theor Biol. 1990 Jun 21;144(4):517-46. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80088-8.